Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

AI agents replacing apps: what it means for users and for Ukraine

At SXSW, Nothing founder Carl Pei predicts the gradual displacement of mobile apps by AI agents. It's not just about convenience — it's a challenge to privacy, the economy and Ukraine's defense capabilities.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 19, 2026 · 2 min read

AI agents replacing apps: what it means for users and for Ukraine
Карл Пей (Фото: Nothing)

What Carl Pei said at SXSW

At the SXSW conference, Nothing founder Carl Pei said that traditional smartphone apps will eventually "disappear," giving way to AI agents — systems that perform tasks on behalf of the user. His logic is that if a product's value is built around a standalone app, that approach will sooner or later be displaced by automated agents that interact directly with services.

"Apps on smartphones will disappear, and they will be replaced by AI agents"

— Carl Pei, CEO of Nothing (talk at SXSW)

How it will work — briefly

The transition is described in stages: first AI executes individual commands (booking tickets, ordering a taxi), then it understands user intent and suggests solutions, and ultimately it acts proactively based on habits and goals. In other words, the interface gradually shifts from "screen→user" to "agent→service," where the person sets goals and the agent carries them out.

Why this matters for you and for Ukraine

Data security and sovereignty. An agent operates through access to large amounts of personal data and services. If these agents are controlled by foreign platforms, the issue of digital independence becomes critical for national security.

Economy and the labor market. The model will change developers' business models: instead of selling standalone apps, services and platforms that can integrate agents will win. For Ukrainian startups this is both a risk and an opportunity — they can build local agents or adapt solutions to European data requirements.

Defense and technological advantage. At the same time, Ukraine is rolling out the Defense AI Center "A1", which will work with data and algorithms. If the state and defense enterprises can develop their own agent solutions, this will improve responsiveness and reduce dependence on external platforms.

Risks and opportunities

Risks include centralized access to data, potential leaks, and dependence on a few large providers. Opportunities include improved convenience, automation of routine processes, and new services for business and government. At the same time, OpenAI is already adjusting ChatGPT's interaction model based on user feedback, which shows that questions of responsibility and control over agents are not theoretical but practical challenges.

What Ukraine should do

Analysts agree the response must be systemic: invest in local AI infrastructure, implement rules for data access, support national developers of agents, and integrate these technologies into defense and critical infrastructure. This is a chance to turn a technological shift into a factor of security and economic growth, rather than a source of vulnerabilities.

Conclusion

Moving from apps to AI agents brings both new opportunities and new threats. The ball is now in the court of policymakers, businesses, and technical communities — can we ensure that the next platform works for the benefit of citizens and the state, rather than undermining their digital autonomy?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026