Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

AI Browsers Atlas and Comet Have Not Yet Displaced Chrome and Safari

Tests revealed that Atlas (OpenAI) and Comet (Perplexity) are operating inconsistently: they sometimes freeze, overload systems, and require user intervention. The issues are linked to website structure; users are calling for greater automation. OpenAI is updating the models.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 8, 2025 · 1 min read

AI Browsers Atlas and Comet Have Not Yet Displaced Chrome and Safari

AI browsers do not yet replace traditional solutions like Chrome or Safari. During tests it was noticed that Atlas from OpenAI and Comet from Perplexity behave unpredictably: sometimes they hang on simple queries, create excessive system load, and require user intervention.

Compatibility with websites

The effectiveness of such browsers largely depends on how web pages are built. Pages with a complex structure or a large number of visual elements are harder for AI to "parse", so some companies prepare simplified versions of sites specifically for generative AI tools — with a clear block structure, without animations and decorative elements.

A Mozilla survey showed that most users turn to generative AI for simple queries where they can personally verify the accuracy of the response. For critical tasks, such as buying tickets or planning trips, people still prefer classic search.

User scenarios and development

Users expect expanded automated capabilities: for the browser to perform routine actions itself — generate reports or update data on websites. Some already use such tools for everyday tasks: reading mail, processing video, or filling spreadsheets with the help of AI.

In addition, OpenAI is working on having models acknowledge mistakes and cases of instruction violations. ChatGPT has received the GPT-5.1 model, as well as an integrated shopping assistant, which is already available in Ukraine.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026