Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Siri with auto-delete chat feature is not privacy marketing, but a response to lawsuit

Apple is preparing a new Siri with three conversation storage modes — but behind this decision lies not only technical ambitions, but also a $95 million lawsuit settlement over "unintentional" recordings.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 2 min read

Siri with auto-delete chat feature is not privacy marketing, but a response to lawsuit
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

When Apple announces "privacy by default," it sounds like an advantage. But context changes the picture: the company just paid $95 million in a lawsuit claiming that Siri had been recording private conversations for years without users' knowledge and sharing data with third parties. Auto-deletion of chats is not just a feature. It's also a public response to the trust that the company itself undermined.

Three options — and none of them is "turn off recording"

According to Bloomberg data cited by journalist Mark Gurman, the new Siri app will offer three settings for storing conversation history: 30 days, 1 year, or forever. The mechanics are copied from the Messages app — such an option has existed there for several years. Separately, users will be able to choose whether Siri launches with the context of a previous conversation.

Apple's principled position, according to Gurman: privacy protection should be built into the system rather than be a separate "incognito mode" that users need to consciously enable. This is a direct jab at ChatGPT, where the Temporary Chat function exists — but as an option, not a standard.

"If the approach works, Apple will have a new argument in the privacy field — and a convenient excuse if the software performs worse than competitors"

Mark Gurman, Bloomberg

Siri leaves beta with a label

At WWDC 2026, which will take place in June, Apple plans to introduce Siri as a separate app with a conversational interface similar to ChatGPT. But according to Bloomberg, the product will launch with a beta label — the same way Apple Intelligence launched in 2024. This is not a technical detail: the beta label releases Apple from its obligations to users while the functionality is still "catching up" with competitors.

Apple first promised a "smart" Siri at WWDC 2024. Most of those promises remain unfulfilled. Now the company is preparing to repeat the announcement — with support for Google Gemini models and an open integration layer for other AI providers.

Why this matters beyond Apple

  • Chat logs from assistants have already been used in criminal cases and civil lawsuits in the US — auto-deletion directly reduces this risk for users.
  • Apple is setting a standard: if a major player makes deletion default, pressure on OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft increases.
  • At the same time, none of the modes means data doesn't reach Apple servers until the moment of deletion — and the company hasn't publicly explained this.

If Apple truly launches Siri with real deletion at the server level — not just with an interface that doesn't allow access to logs — it will change the industry standard. But so far, no technical description has been published about where and how data is stored between the conversation and deletion: will WWDC 2026 be the moment when Apple publicly explains this, or will it again leave the question open?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026