Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Diia chooses name for national AI — from language to security

Voting has begun in the Diia app to choose the name of the Ukrainian large language model being developed together with Kyivstar. This is more than a brand — it’s about language, trust, and national security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Diia chooses name for national AI — from language to security
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

About the vote

In the Diia app, voting has begun for the name of the national large language model (LLM). The model is being developed in partnership with Kyivstar, and 10 finalists were selected from over 3,000 user submissions: Сяйво, Питай, Слово, Дзвінка, Говерла, Шипіт, Шукай, Ядро, Кавун, Гомін.

Voting runs until March 29, 12:00 in the «Services» → «Polls» section of Diia. The results will determine the official name under which the Ukrainian AI will enter public and commercial services.

Reminder: in December 2025 the state began collecting data to train the model from over 90 state institutions, and also formed a team working on the national LLM.

Why the choice of name matters

The name is not just marketing. It affects how the technology is perceived by citizens, the trust of partners, and the readiness to integrate the model into education, healthcare, and defense systems. A local LLM must work with dialects, historical features, and the context of the Ukrainian language — its usefulness in real life depends on this.

Beyond the cultural dimension, there is a practical side: questions of data, transparency of model training, and cybersecurity. Experts in language technologies and information security note that the name can become a marker of standards — whether the model will be positioned as “native”, regulated and accountable.

"A name is not only a brand; it is a marker of trust and responsibility toward the language and security. It is important that the chosen name reflect both technical quality and the national context."

— Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine

How to vote and what happens next

You can vote directly in Diia: open the «Services» → «Polls» section, choose one of the 10 finalists and confirm your vote. After the result is announced, the name will be used in the model's communications, documentation and integrations with the public sector and business.

Next comes the technical part: training the model on the collected corpora, pilot implementations, security audits and open testing. The transparency of this process will determine whether the project is accepted by Ukrainian users and international partners.

Conclusion

The vote in Diia is the first public step in creating the national LLM. This is not just choosing a catchy word: it is the moment when the technology receives a social license. Whether the chosen name becomes a symbol of trust depends not only on the vote, but also on the subsequent openness, standards and responsibility of the development team.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026