Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Ukraine tests microwave anti-drone weapons: how will this change the front line?

The systematic work of Ukrainian engineers is reaching a new level: testing prototypes of microwave weapons could change approaches to defending against drone swarms and reduce the strain on conventional air‑defense systems.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukraine tests microwave anti-drone weapons: how will this change the front line?

Testing in Ukraine: brief and important

Andriy Hrytseniuk, CEO of the Brave1 defense cluster, said on the "To Arms!" program on the "Militarniy" YouTube channel that Ukrainian developers are already testing prototypes of microwave weapons to counter drones. This is not just a technological novelty — it is a response to the real threats facing the military and critical infrastructure.

“Ukrainian developers are already testing prototypes of microwave weapons to counter drones,”

— Andriy Hrytseniuk, CEO of the Brave1 defense cluster

How it works

Microwave weapons disable unmanned aerial vehicles using directed electromagnetic radiation. Unlike projectiles or interceptors, such systems do not require expendable munitions and can, in theory, affect multiple targets simultaneously — which is important against swarms of drones.

Details of the Ukrainian developments, including technical specifications and test results, currently remain classified.

International context

Similar solutions have already been demonstrated by foreign companies: the American firm Epirus, with its Leonidas system, reported the simultaneous neutralization of dozens of drones during range trials in autumn 2023. Separate experiments with microwave systems have also been conducted by British units, and at the same time Ukrainian drones, including the new version of Octopus, were presented to representatives of the British government — this indicates a growing interest from partners in comprehensive solutions against unmanned threats.

Why Ukraine needs it

There are four practical arguments in favor of developing such systems:

  • Responsiveness: a rapid reaction to swarms of drones, which are increasingly used to attack infrastructure and forces.
  • Cost-effectiveness: the lack of expendable munitions and the ability to affect multiple targets at once reduce costs in the long term.
  • Technological independence: domestic solutions reduce dependence on imported components and open up export prospects.
  • Protection of civilian facilities: such systems can be integrated with air defense and urban infrastructure to provide an additional layer of security.

What’s next

The key now is to turn prototypes into reliable field samples: open trials in conditions close to combat, certification, integration with existing command systems, as well as funding for mass production. Analysts and military experts note that success in this area will depend less on individual demonstrations and more on systemic support from the state and the defense industry.

Whether Ukrainian engineers will succeed in turning test samples into effective systems that will operate under fire and in complex electromagnetic conditions is an open question. The answer depends on coordination among the military, the people developing the equipment, and the political will of partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026