Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

White House App on Federal Officials' Work iPhones: 77% of Traffic Goes to Third-Party Servers

The Trump administration is forcing millions of civil servants to install an official application on their work smartphones. Cybersecurity experts have already determined that only 23% of the app's requests go to whitehouse.gov — the rest go to commercial services, none of which are certified under federal security standards.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 25, 2026 · 2 min read

White House App on Federal Officials' Work iPhones: 77% of Traffic Goes to Third-Party Servers
Дональд Трамп (Фото: Depositphotos)

The FAA — Federal Aviation Administration — informed its employees on Friday: next week, the IT team will automatically install "The White House" app on all official iPhones and iPads. Without request, without choice. It will simply appear on the screen.

This is not a local initiative of the aviation agency. Federal CIO Greg Barbaccia issued an order to chief information officers of agencies to help the White House deploy the app on all official mobile devices of the executive branch. According to Government Executive, this concerns millions of phones.

What's inside the app

The app launched in March 2025 with a promise to give citizens "unfiltered" access to the administration's priorities. Inside are press releases, official media, a selection of news articles, and a "Text President Trump" button, which actually leads to a subscription to a marketing mailing list.

Federal employees will receive the same public version — with no additional functions or access levels. This is precisely what cybersecurity experts find most concerning.

"Any app installed on an official device potentially creates a backdoor to government networks behind the firewall."

— Hashmi, former official of the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), quoted by Government Executive

Numbers that don't match the rhetoric

An independent analysis of the app's code and network traffic conducted by researcher atomic.computer revealed a structural problem: only 23% of the app's requests go to whitehouse.gov — the remaining 77% go to third-party commercial services.

Network analysis confirmed: each time the app launches, it transmits the IP address, time zone, device model, OS version, number and duration of sessions, and a persistent unique identifier to the OneSignal service — despite the permissions description stating "this app does not use your location," and the privacy manifest declaring zero data collection.

  • The app transmits IP addresses, time zones, and other user data to third-party services.
  • Among the identified vulnerabilities is Elfsight, a Russia-based company that provides widgets for the app, through which personal data of some White House staff members became publicly available.
  • None of the commercial services involved have FedRAMP authorization — a mandatory federal security standard for cloud products in the public sector.
  • GPS tracking was initially present but was removed after public disclosure.

"Propaganda" or standard practice?

The White House defends the decision with a standard argument. Spokeswoman Olivia Wales stated that "government devices typically have pre-installed apps useful for the daily work of civil servants."

Former government technology official David Nesting views the situation differently: "It's simply a way to force all federal employees to see the same propaganda they are spreading to the public."

The precedent is indeed non-standard: officials — both current and former — called this step extremely unusual and even dangerous. Previously, official devices could have communication tools like Teams or Zoom installed — but not politically colored content from a specific administration.

If even one of the third-party services involved proves to be a data leak vector — no one has been officially assigned responsibility for auditing the security of this decision.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026