Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Veterans

"Left in 2015, returned in 2016, died in Kharkiv region in 2026: Bucha says goodbye to Oleksandr Novitskyi"

Oleksandr Novytskyi defended Ukraine in the ATO zone in Luhansk region long before Bucha became a symbol. Nine years after returning from the front, he died during evacuation to a hospital.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 8, 2026 · 2 min read

"Left in 2015, returned in 2016, died in Kharkiv region in 2026: Bucha says goodbye to Oleksandr Novitskyi"

On March 31, 2026, Oleksandr Novitskyi died during evacuation to a hospital in Kharkiv region. He was 49 years old. Today, the Bucha community is saying farewell to a man who stood up to defend Ukraine at a time when most people were not even speaking the word "front."

2015. Luhansk region. ATO

Oleksandr went to war in 2015 — during the first, most difficult rotation cycle in the east, when volunteers and conscripts were thrown in to plug holes in Luhansk region. By the end of 2016, he returned home to Bucha and returned to ordinary life: work at a factory, family.

The fact that he managed to return at all is already a statistical rarity for those who fought in the ATO zone in 2015–2016 on the Luhansk direction.

Bucha after Bucha

The city where he lived and worked became known to the entire world a few years after his demobilization for the worst of reasons. Oleksandr Novitskyi is one of those Buchans whose defensive contribution preceded the occupation but remained overshadowed by more prominent events.

Oleksandr is remembered as a kind and sincere person. He worked at a factory in Bucha. The defender is survived by his wife Svitlana, his father, and his brother, who is now also defending Ukraine.

Bucha City Council

Death during evacuation

The circumstances of his death — a sharp deterioration in health while in Kharkiv region and death during evacuation to a hospital — point to a situation faced by dozens of veterans: health undermined on the front manifests itself years later, often without timely medical care nearby.

His brother is now on the front. His wife Svitlana and father lost two sons at the same time — one was buried, the other is fighting.

Number by number

  • 2015 — the year he went to the front
  • 2016 — return to Bucha
  • 49 years — his age at the time of death
  • 9 years — between demobilization and death

If Oleksandr's health deteriorated as a result of service in the ATO zone — and this is a typical picture for veterans of that generation — then his death raises a specific question: are ATO veterans who formally "returned alive" in 2015–2016 receiving systematic medical support today, or does the state consider its task completed at the moment of demobilization?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026