Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Benfica in crisis: loss to Juventus complicates Trubin and Sudakov's Champions League chances

Lisbon's Benfica fell 2–0 to Juventus — Ukrainian players played the full match. We examine why this defeat matters for the club and for the careers of our footballers right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Benfica in crisis: loss to Juventus complicates Trubin and Sudakov's Champions League chances

The match in Turin proved to be more than just another result in the table: it was a litmus test for Benfica’s ambitions in European competitions and a test for the Ukrainian legionnaires. A 0:2 defeat puts the Lisbon side on the brink of elimination, and for Anatoliy Trubin and Heorhiy Sudakov — it is a signal of how both the club and the market will react.

Match chronology

The first half was relatively balanced — there were no goals, and both teams searched for ways into the opponent’s penalty area. After the break Juventus increased the tempo and pressure, which quickly produced a result: in the 55th minute Thuram scored, and the final score was set in the 64th by David McKennie. The 2:0 score reflected the Italians’ advantage in the key moments of the second half.

Implications for tournament prospects

The defeat significantly complicates Benfica’s chances of advancing from the group. According to reports, the team will have to beat Real Madrid by a large margin in the final round and simultaneously hope for synchronized point losses by at least six rivals — a combination that makes the task practically unforeseeable.

"Now Mourinho's charges need to beat Real by a good margin in the final match and hope for synchronized point losses by at least six rivals."

— UNN

How the Ukrainian legionnaires performed

Anatoliy Trubin played the full match and several times genuinely rescued the team in the first half: winning duels, acting confidently on set pieces and in coming off his line. However, after the break Benfica’s defensive line lost compactness, and Trubin came under a barrage of attacks — the conceded goals were more a consequence of systemic problems than a personal failure by the goalkeeper.

Heorhiy Sudakov was one of the most active in building attacks: dropping deep, looking for options through the middle, and trying to create danger. But Juventus’ intense pressing greatly reduced the available space — many passes did not reach the final third, and attempts to sharpen the play were quickly neutralized.

"Both conceded goals were the result of systemic team mistakes, not individual miscalculations by the Ukrainian."

— UNN

Context and conclusion

This defeat matters not only for the table: it affects players’ market value, the team’s morale and subsequent personnel decisions. Trubin is already spoken of as one of the most prominent Ukrainian goalkeepers abroad — his role at Benfica and performances in matches like this will directly influence the further development of his career and his readiness for the national team.

The question remains: will they in Lisbon turn this defeat into a push for systemic changes — and will our legionnaires themselves respond to the challenge in the coming rounds?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026