Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Hutsulyak returns to Polissya: club's decision a move to benefit the national team

Ukraine's top scorer in 2025 has returned to training with the first team — the president of Polissia explains how the decision affects the chances of qualifying for the World Cup.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

January 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Hutsulyak returns to Polissya: club's decision a move to benefit the national team

Return in the context of qualifying

According to the official site of Zhytomyr’s Polissya and UNN, forward Oleksiy Hutsulyak — the Ukraine national team’s top scorer in 2025 — is training with the first team again. This decision, according to the club president, has a clear strategic purpose: to prepare the player for a potential call-up to the national team for the March World Cup qualifying matches.

Why the club made this decision

President Hennadiy Butkevych openly links the player’s return to the national team’s interest. Butkevych says he spoke with the national team coach Serhiy Rebrov, who intends to take Hutsulyak’s form into account when selecting the squad. This is a classic example of a club adjusting internal decisions to external national priorities: the team is closing ranks to strengthen Ukraine’s chances in an important stretch of qualifying.

I decided that Oleksiy should join Polissya’s training camp in Spain. He performs well for the Ukraine national team, and we all understand the important task the country now faces — to make it to the World Cup. I spoke with Serhiy Rebrov, and he said he will consider Hutsulyak’s form. If Oleksiy is in good shape, he could receive a call-up for the March matches. So right now the best decision is to work and prepare together with the team.

— Hennadiy Butkevych, president of Polissya

What happened at the club: contracts and discipline

Alongside the return to training, the club took personnel steps: defender Serhiy Chobotenko and winger Oleksiy Hutsulyak were temporarily moved to the U-19 team. Polissya explains this by saying the players refused to renew contracts that expire in the summer.

The club claims it offered new contracts with revised salaries, a bonus system, and a clear vision of the players’ roles for several seasons ahead. At the same time, according to Butkevych, a request appeared for a larger sum, “that did not correspond to reality,” and such demands are most often voiced by players’ agents. In the end, the club chose to prioritize the balance of finances and the atmosphere in the dressing room.

Consequences for the national team and the club

Polissya’s decision is a compromise between the club’s and the state’s interests. For the national team, it is a chance to get a player in optimal form; for the club, it is a way to protect team chemistry and financial discipline. Football managers often stress that preparing a player for national tasks is better done systematically rather than episodically — and here Polissya chose that approach.

In brief: Hutsulyak returns to the first team to increase his chances of a national team call-up. At the same time, the club maintains its stance on contracts — a pragmatic approach intended to protect collective interests.

What’s next?

If Hutsulyak confirms his form at the Spain camp, Rebrov may consider him for the March qualifying matches. Another question is whether this move will signal to other clubs: will more club owners adjust personnel decisions to the national team’s requests at critical moments of qualifying? The answer will affect both the transfer market and the tactics for preparing for important international matches.

Sources: Polissya official website, UNN.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026