Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

ITIA bans Frenchman Follio for 20 years over match‑fixing

The International Tennis Integrity Agency has banned 26‑year‑old Quentin Follio from competing until May 2044, fined him $70,000 and ordered him to repay more than $44,000 for participating in match‑fixing.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 11, 2025 · 1 min read

ITIA bans Frenchman Follio for 20 years over match‑fixing

The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) has issued a 20-year ban on French tennis player Quentin Follio and fined him $70,000 for involvement in match-fixing.

ITIA ruling

The agency found that 26-year-old Follio committed 27 breaches of the Tennis Anti-Corruption Program. He was ordered to repay more than $44,000, identified as corrupt payments. The ban will remain in effect until May 2044.

In 2022 Follio was ranked 488th in the world. He denied 30 charges relating to 11 matches between 2022 and 2024.

Nature of the violations

The investigation found that Follio played a central role in a network of players acting on behalf of a syndicate that organized fixed matches.

  • manipulating results
  • accepting payments in exchange for not giving full effort
  • offering bribes to other participants
  • providing inside information
  • collusion with other players
  • refusal to cooperate with the investigation
  • destruction of evidence

"a conduit for a broader criminal syndicate"

– Amani Khalifa

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026