Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Messi doesn't see himself as a coach — opts for the role of club owner and future investor

Lionel Messi has signed a contract with Inter Miami through 2027/28, but is simultaneously investing in a lower‑tier team in Uruguay. We examine why the ownership model matters to a world‑class footballer and what this means for youth development and club infrastructure.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Messi doesn't see himself as a coach — opts for the role of club owner and future investor

Brief and to the point

Lionel Messi said he does not see himself in the role of a coach after retiring, preferring instead the role of a owner or club manager. The information was released by ESPN and republished by UNN. Despite a new contract with Inter Miami through the 2027/2028 season, Messi is already putting the idea into practice — together with Luis Suárez he founded the Uruguayan fourth-division club Deportivo LSM.

What exactly Messi said

"I don't see myself as a coach. I like the idea of being a manager, but I would prefer to be an owner. I would like to have my own club, start from the bottom and make it grow. To have the opportunity to give kids the chance to develop and to achieve something important. If I had to choose, that's what would attract me the most."

— Lionel Messi, footballer

Why it matters

Messi's decision is not just a personal dream. It's a model of long-term investment in football: instead of trying to run a team directly from the coaching bench, he chooses control over infrastructure and the player development process. This approach allows shaping a club philosophy, investing in academies, and building a sustainable financial model — elements that can genuinely change the quality of youth development.

About Deportivo LSM and the scale of the project

The club, whose abbreviation contains the initials of Luis Suárez and Messi, is already making its presence known: around 80 employees and approximately 3,000 members. This is not just a branding initiative — it's a tool for broad outreach to children and young players at the local level. For Latin American countries and border regions, such projects often become catalysts for the emergence of a new generation of footballers.

Context of successes and trust

At the same time, Messi continues to bring benefits to Inter Miami: his two assists helped the club win the MLS Cup in the final against the Vancouver Whitecaps (3:1), which became the 47th trophy of his career. This is not a decorative fact: sporting success increases sponsor confidence and provides resources for investing in one's own projects. Career companions like Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets have finished playing, but the model of influencing the game can change — not from the coaching bench, but through clubs and academies.

What this gives society and why it’s worth attention

The ownership model from a major player is an example for countries that are rebuilding infrastructure or looking for new ways to support youth football. For the Ukrainian reader the practical takeaway is important: grassroots work, investments in schools and clubs deliver sustainable results more than instant attention. Messi is not choosing showmanship — he is choosing a long-term system.

Summary

Preferring the role of owner over coach is not an escape from the sport, but a pragmatic choice of how to influence the game after an active career. Now the question for the environment is: will Messi's ambitions be turned into a sustainable development model that other stars and local projects can replicate? The answer will depend on how seriously resources and attention are invested in long-term institutions.

Sources: ESPN, UNN report; MLS match summaries.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026