Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

IOC Bans Helmet Honoring Vladyslav Heraskevych — NOC Demands Review

The decision affects not just one athlete: the issue of commemorating fallen Ukrainians intersects with Olympic rules and the information war. We examine why the NOC appealed to the IOC and what consequences this could have.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 2 min read

IOC Bans Helmet Honoring Vladyslav Heraskevych — NOC Demands Review

What happened

According to UNN citing the NOC of Ukraine, the International Olympic Committee did not allow skeleton racer and flagbearer of the Ukrainian team Vladyslav Heraskevych to compete at the XXV Winter Olympic Games 2026 in Milan–Cortina wearing a special “memorial helmet”. In response, the National Olympic Committee appealed to the IOC asking it to review the decision and allow the athlete to honor his fallen Ukrainian colleagues.

The helmet was created to honor Ukrainian athletes who died defending Ukraine or became victims of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine. The NOC of Ukraine emphasizes that it fully complies with safety requirements and IOC rules, contains no advertising, political slogans, or discriminatory elements, and was confirmed as compliant with established norms during official training. Ukraine has always respected, respects, and will respect Olympic values and adheres to the Olympic Charter.

— NOC of Ukraine

Government reaction and information background

President Volodymyr Zelensky reacted to the ban, emphasizing the importance of conveying the truth about the war to the international audience through major platforms, including sport. At the same time, the Center for Countering Disinformation recorded a disinformation campaign: Russian propagandists allegedly circulated a fake segment edited to resemble material from the Canadian broadcaster CBC in order to discredit Ukrainian athletes.

Why this matters

The situation combines several levels: firstly, IOC rules traditionally prohibit obvious political messages on athletes' uniforms. Secondly, in a time of full-scale war symbolic gestures acquire additional meaning for the Ukrainian public and the international community. Thirdly, against the backdrop of the adversary’s active information campaign, any decision by sports institutions automatically gains political and media resonance.

What may happen next

The NOC expects a “fair, objective, and impartial decision” from the IOC and insists on a transparent review of arguments regarding safety and compliance with the rules. Information security analysts note that the IOC’s decision will have not only sporting but also reputational consequences: it may send a signal to Ukraine’s partners about how international institutions view ways of commemorating the dead during wartime. Whether sporting rules can take the humanitarian context into account without turning the Olympics into a platform for propaganda will depend on the parties’ arguments and the vigilance of the international community.

Sources: UNN (from a statement by the NOC of Ukraine), NOC statement, data from the Center for Countering Disinformation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026