Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Mudryk could train six months before his suspension ends — what it means for the national team and who else is on their radar

Ihor Tsyhanyk reported: Mykhailo Mudryk could return to training six months before the end of the sanctions; meanwhile the national team is considering the naturalization of Shakhtar's Brazilians — we analyze the benefits and risks for the national team.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

January 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Mudryk could train six months before his suspension ends — what it means for the national team and who else is on their radar

What happened

Journalist Ihor Tsyganyk, in his YouTube project quoted by UNN, voiced several important points about the future of the Ukraine national team. According to him, midfielder Mykhailo Mudryk may be allowed to train with the team 6 months before the end of his suspension. As an example, Tsyganyk cites a precedent in world football — Paul Pogba, who previously had similar conditions.

Who else is on the radar

In addition to Mudryk, Tsyganyk named Shakhtar’s Brazilian left-back Pedro Henrique as a potential reinforcement for the national team via naturalization. Another foreign player from the Donetsk club — Pedrinho — has also been mentioned in the media. According to the journalist, both players are still “considering this option.”

"Right now both footballers are considering this option. They are thinking about how beneficial it is, how much they need it, how they intend to connect themselves with Ukraine, because there are certain risks... But at this stage there is no concrete consent from the players themselves."

— Ihor Tsyganyk, sports journalist

Why this matters for the national team

Integrating Mudryk into the training process before the official end of his suspension could help him maintain match fitness and speed up a full return to competition. The naturalization of Brazilians would allow a quick reinforcement of the flanks and creativity, especially if these are young players with experience in European club competitions.

Legal and reputational risks

It is important to separate facts from assumptions. Suspensions and naturalization issues are regulated by different authorities — from national legislation to sports bodies (WADA, FIFA). The Pogba precedent provides an argument, but not an automatic guarantee. It is also necessary to consider the legal obligations that accompany obtaining citizenship and how this will be perceived publicly during the war — a point, as Tsyganyk notes, that the players are paying attention to.

What this means in practice

If Mudryk does train with the team before the full lifting of sanctions, this will reduce the time needed to return to optimal physical condition. If the naturalization of Pedro Henrique or Pedrinho goes ahead, the national team will gain additional options in the squad, but this will also raise questions for the FFU and the government about legal procedures and public communication.

Forecast

Experts note that such steps generally increase the team's competitiveness if they are carried out transparently and in accordance with the rules. What matters now is that the statements turn into confirmed actions: decisions by sports authorities regarding Mudryk’s training regime and the final positions of the players themselves on naturalization.

A final question: can the right personnel policy not only strengthen the team on the pitch but also become an element of trust in the national team at a difficult time for the country?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026