Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Kolos-2 striker Danylo Kolesnyk assaulted a TCC employee — club suspended and dismissed the player

A video has surfaced online showing a 24-year-old forward from Kolos-2 striking an employee of the territorial recruitment center. The club has already apologized and announced suspension and dismissal — we examine why the incident matters during wartime.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Kolos-2 striker Danylo Kolesnyk assaulted a TCC employee — club suspended and dismissed the player

What happened

24‑year‑old forward of FC Kolos's second team Danylo Kolesnyk found himself at the center of a scandal after a video appeared online showing him striking an employee of the Territorial Recruitment Center (TRC). The video was initially posted on the player's Instagram — it was later deleted and the account made private, but copies quickly spread to other platforms. The incident was reported by UNN, citing the club's official statement.

Club reaction

"Football Club 'Kolos' and personally the club president Andriy Zasukha apologize to the Ukrainian community and, in particular, to our servicemen... At the moment the player has been suspended from participation in the training process and today he will be released from the 'Kolos‑2' team. FC 'Kolos' fundamentally condemns any manifestations of violence and unlawful behavior..."

— official statement of FC «Kolos» (Facebook), quoted by UNN

The club reacted promptly: the player was temporarily suspended from training and the club announced its intention to terminate his employment. The statement emphasized the unacceptability of violence, especially against servicemen — an aspect that carries particular public resonance during the war.

TRC reaction and public response

"By his anthropometric data the forward of Kolos's second team... is fully suitable for the air assault troops. And why wouldn't the young man go on contract service, not waiting for mobilization and reaching conscription age, to vent his rage fighting the enemy"

— message from the Kyiv Regional TRC

The TRC's comment added a political and ethical dimension to the discussion: part of the audience saw the incident as a reason to talk about the responsibility of public figures and possible avenues for atonement through service, while others viewed it as a signal for serious disciplinary and legal consequences. Copies of the video circulated rapidly on social networks, increasing pressure on the club.

Context and consequences

Why this matters. In wartime, standards of conduct for representatives of institutions — from government to sport — are under heightened scrutiny. Violent actions undermine trust in the club, affect the team's reputation and may have legal consequences for the player.

What next. The official suspension and announced dismissal are the first step; further measures by law enforcement and football authorities are possible. For clubs, this is a signal of the need for clearer ethical rules and proactive communication.

About the player

Danylo Kolesnyk (born 2001), centre‑forward. This season for Kolos‑2 he played 16 matches and scored 6 goals; he previously appeared for Mynai, Livyi Bereh and VPK‑Agro. His biography also includes an episode in 2022: at a training camp in Turkey he was involved in a conflict with players of Russia's Shinnik when he defended a hotel cleaner — at the time, stepping in to defend staff was perceived differently.

Question to the reader: Is the club's reaction sufficient to restore trust, and what role should clubs and leagues play in shaping professional ethics during a national crisis?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026