Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Ukraine's top three football leaders: how much Zinchenko, Dovbyk and Zabarnyi earn — and what it means

Zinchenko, Dovbyk and Zabarnyi earn from roughly €5 to €5.56 million gross per year. That's more than just numbers — a signal to the market, to investors and to the image of Ukrainian football in Europe.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 18, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukraine's top three football leaders: how much Zinchenko, Dovbyk and Zabarnyi earn — and what it means

Brief — the numbers that speak for themselves

According to the financial portal Capology (via UNN), the highest base annual salaries among Ukrainian footballers in European clubs currently belong to Oleksandr Zinchenko, Artem Dovbyk and Illia Zabarnyi — in the range of approximately €5–5.56 million gross. These amounts do not include bonuses and commercial contracts, which can significantly increase players' actual incomes.

Who and how much

Oleksandr Zinchenko — Ajax (Amsterdam): about €5 million gross per year (~€96,000 per week). In his debut match for the Amsterdam club the defender suffered a serious injury, which may affect playing time and bonus payments.

Artem Dovbyk — Roma: approximately €5.56 million gross per year (~€106,900 per week). The contract runs until summer 2029; guaranteed payments under the agreement exceed €22 million, not including bonuses.

Illia Zabarnyi — Paris Saint-Germain: about €5.45 million gross per year (~€104,800 per week). The contract runs until 2030, and total payments under the agreement may exceed €27 million.

"Data from Capology record players' base annual salaries at European clubs; actual incomes are often higher due to bonuses and commercial deals. This is a typical trend for players with consistent performances in top leagues."

— Capology (in a UNN report)

Why it matters for Ukraine

These contracts are not only about individual income. First, they indicate the trust of major European clubs in Ukrainian players and coaching schools. Second, high salaries attract attention and investment: agents, scouts and sponsors watch the clubs and countries where the market for talent is rising.

Analysts note that such contracts can have a multiplier effect: transfer values of other Ukrainians increase, opportunities for commercial deals grow, and under favorable conditions part of the income can return as investments in youth academies and infrastructure.

What next

Numbers alone will not change the system — but they send an important signal. The question for Ukrainian football and those who manage it is: how to transform individual successes into systemic development (academies, coaching programs, veteran support and reinvestment in infrastructure)?

Additional reminder: the salaries shown are base gross annual amounts. Signing bonuses, performance bonuses and commercial contracts can make players' incomes much higher, and therefore clubs' positions and the player's health (injuries, rehabilitation) directly affect actual earnings.

Summary: these three names are more than personal success stories. They are a marker of the European market's trust in Ukrainian football and a potential resource for its rebuilding and modernization. How we use this resource is a strategic question.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026