Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Sports

Ukrainians finish in Milan–Cortina: 6th in ski aerials and 46 athletes had no accreditation issues

Five Ukrainians competed in skiing disciplines at the 2026 Olympic Games: the team squandered a sixth-place finish in the mixed aerials competition, and the NOC reports full accreditation for 46 athletes. Why are these facts important for Ukraine’s image and the development of winter sports?

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrainians finish in Milan–Cortina: 6th in ski aerials and 46 athletes had no accreditation issues

Briefly

On 21 February in Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo five Ukrainian athletes completed their events at the 2026 Olympic Games. They competed in ski aerials and cross‑country skiing. Results were reported by the Ministry of Youth and Sports of Ukraine and the NOC.

How the competitions went

The last events for our athletes were the mixed team competition in ski aerials and the men's 50 km mass start in cross‑country skiing. In the mixed team tournament (Angelina Brikina, Oleksandr Okipnyuk, Dmytro Kotovskyi) the team finished in 6th place. In the 50 km mass start in cross‑country skiing Dmytro Drahun — 43rd place, Oleksandr Lisohor — 40th place.

Freestyle. Ski aerials. Mixed team competition (Angelina Brikina, Oleksandr Okipnyuk, Dmytro Kotovskyi) — 6th place. Cross‑country skiing. Men. Mass start. 50 km. Dmytro Drahun — 43rd place, Oleksandr Lisohor — 40th place.

— Ministry of Youth and Sports / NOC of Ukraine

Organization and consequences

The NOC of Ukraine additionally reported that all 46 Ukrainian athletes at the Olympics were accredited on time; no problems with logistics or injuries were recorded. This is an important indicator not only for the athletes but also for public administration and the country's international image — flawless operational work allows concentration on results instead of emergency logistics.

Why this matters

6th place in the mixed tournament shows that Ukrainian ski aerials can compete in the team format — even under resource‑intensive training conditions during the war. Full accreditation and the absence of incidents are proof of the operational capability of the organizers and of voluntary support, which allow athletes to train and perform without distractions.

Sports community analysts note that such results provide grounds for well‑argued requests for investment in infrastructure and training programs. Today it is important not only to celebrate the athletes' hard work, but to turn visibility into systemic support — financial, coaching, and medical.

Conclusion

The results shown are a combination of individual effort and the quality work of sporting bodies. The next step for Ukraine is to convert these signals of attention into long‑term investments and programs that will make performances regular rather than episodic. Will sports authorities and society be able to seize this window of opportunity?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026