Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

1,940 apartment buildings in Kyiv without heating after Russian strikes — where the worst damage occurred and how repairs are progressing

After the attacks on January 9 and 20, 1,940 buildings in Kyiv remain without heating. We examine which districts were hardest hit, what municipal utility crews have already done, and why this matters for residents this winter.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 23, 2026 · 2 min read

1,940 apartment buildings in Kyiv without heating after Russian strikes — where the worst damage occurred and how repairs are progressing

Brief

In Kyiv, after the missile strikes on January 9 and 20, 1,940 apartment buildings remain without heat supply, Mayor Vitali Klitschko reported on Telegram, citing data from communal services and UNN. Overnight, crews restored heating to more than 650 additional buildings and continue working.

"As of this morning, 1,940 apartment buildings still remain without heat supply; they are being reconnected for the second time after enemy attacks on January 9 and 20. Most of these buildings are on the city's left bank, in the Pecherskyi district, and some are in the Holosiivskyi and Solomianskyi districts."

— Vitali Klitschko, mayor of Kyiv (Telegram)

Where the biggest problems are

The largest number of outages has been recorded on the left bank and in the Pecherskyi, Holosiivskyi and Solomianskyi districts. This concentrates repair work for brigades and increases the load on certain sections of the heating networks.

What has been done and what is being done

Communal services and energy workers restored heating to over 650 buildings overnight — a sign of swift mobilization of resources. Work continues: network diagnostics, replacement of damaged sections, and staged reconnection of subscribers following safety procedures.

Context and consequences

Prime Minister D. Shmyhal stated that the power system endured one of its most difficult days since November 2022. Attacks on the energy sector have not only temporary technical consequences — they affect the daily lives of millions, create additional risks for vulnerable groups, and require not only repairs but also strengthened network protection over the long term.

What this means for residents

Heating outages are not only a matter of discomfort. They raise safety concerns (especially for the elderly and families with children), logistical issues (replacement of appliances, access for repair crews) and financial burdens (costs for emergency measures and network restoration). City authorities ask residents to follow official announcements and contact the appropriate services in case of emergencies.

Conclusion

Restoring heat in the majority of buildings is the result of rapid work by crews and coordination among services. At the same time, the strike revealed the vulnerability of critical infrastructure and served as a reminder of the need to invest in network protection. The task now is to complete restoration and minimize the risk of repeated large-scale outages in the coming weeks. Whether there will be sufficient resources and time for this is a question that determines residents' safety this winter.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026