Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

307 monuments in 2025: how the war is destroying Ukraine’s cultural memory — and what’s next

The Ministry of Culture has released detailed figures on destruction for 2025 and overall since the start of the full-scale invasion. This is not merely statistics — it is the loss of public spaces, libraries, and museums, without which the country's recovery will be more difficult.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 6, 2026 · 2 min read

307 monuments in 2025: how the war is destroying Ukraine’s cultural memory — and what’s next

Quiet losses and clear figures

In 2025 the Ministry of Culture recorded that as a result of Russian aggression 307 cultural heritage sites and 261 cultural infrastructure facilities were destroyed or damaged. Overall, since the start of the full-scale invasion 1,640 heritage sites and 2,446 cultural infrastructure facilities have been damaged. These numbers are not abstract statistics: they are art schools, clubs, libraries and museums that shape local and national identity.

"In 2025, as a result of Russian aggression in Ukraine, 307 cultural heritage sites and 261 cultural infrastructure facilities were destroyed or damaged. Overall, since the start of the full-scale invasion 1,640 cultural heritage sites and 2,446 cultural infrastructure facilities have suffered damage."

— Ministry of Culture of Ukraine

Where losses are greatest

The most damage has been recorded in Kharkiv region (344 sites), Kherson (297), Odesa (182), Donetsk (175) and in Kyiv and Kyiv region (163). It is also noted that a significant part of Luhansk and parts of Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Kherson regions remain under temporary occupation — this complicates accurate accounting and, accordingly, planning for restoration.

What infrastructure was affected

Among damaged cultural infrastructure facilities the hardest hit were: club venues — 1,193, libraries — 854, art education institutions — 188, museums and galleries — 136, as well as theaters and philharmonics (50). In addition, parks, nature reserves, a film studio in Kyiv and other sites important to community life and the cultural economy were affected.

International reaction

On 4 December UNESCO's committee supported Ukraine's initiative and decided to add another 19 Ukrainian cultural heritage sites to the International List of Cultural Property under Enhanced Protection. This is an important signal: the international community has recognized the risks and provided tools to minimize them, but protection requires access and resources for practical implementation.

"The UNESCO Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict supported Ukraine's initiative and decided to add another 19 Ukrainian cultural heritage sites to the International List of Cultural Property under Enhanced Protection."

— UNESCO Committee

Why this matters to everyone

The destruction of cultural infrastructure affects more than the aesthetics of the urban environment: it is the loss of educational opportunities, economic mechanisms (tourism, creative industries) and social cohesion. Restoration requires not only money but also security, access to territories, professional personnel and international coordination.

Heritage preservation experts emphasize: UNESCO's decision is a step forward, but for it to have an effect, rapid inspections, long-term funding and clear local restoration plans are needed. The temporary occupation of a significant portion of territories makes these tasks even more difficult.

Now the ball is in the partners' court: will international decisions and statements be turned into practical assistance — funding, expertise and access for restoration — on which the speed and dignity of our culture's return to life will depend?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026