Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

600,000 Kyiv residents left after strikes: Klitschko warns of critical state of services in the city

After the January 9 attacks, about 600,000 people left Kyiv — not only out of fear, but because infrastructure was destroyed. We examine what this means for security, everyday life in the city, and the next steps for authorities and partners.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 21, 2026 · 2 min read

600,000 Kyiv residents left after strikes: Klitschko warns of critical state of services in the city

Briefly: scale of displacement

Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko reported that after Russian strikes on January 9, roughly 600,000 residents left the city. The information was reported by UNN citing The Times. This is not just a statistic — it is an indicator of how strikes on infrastructure are changing the demographics and the rhythm of life in the capital.

What happened to services

According to Klitschko, as a result of the attacks a large number of buildings were left without heating: currently about 5,600 apartment buildings are without heat. The mayor gave the example that in some homes it is so cold that the water in toilets is freezing. The government reported that water supply in Kyiv was fully restored after another hostile attack during the night of January 20; at the same time President Zelensky said on January 20 that more than one million consumers remain without electricity.

"Not everyone can leave the city, but at present the population is decreasing"

— Vitali Klitschko, mayor of Kyiv

Why this matters

Attacks on critical infrastructure have several simultaneous effects: they force people to evacuate, increase the burden on evacuation and aid logistics, and also create additional health and safety risks for those who remain. Analysts note that shutting off heating and electricity in autumn or winter greatly increases the likelihood of humanitarian problems, even if the direct losses from shelling are relatively localized.

What to do next

In the short term, restoration of heat supply must be accelerated, hospitals and critical facilities provided with generators, and aid corridors established for those who have left or who have nowhere to evacuate to. In the medium and long term, protecting infrastructure and modernizing systems becomes important so that strikes do not lead to mass displacements in the future.

It is now important that partners' pledges of assistance turn into concrete deliveries of equipment, repair crews, and funding for recovery. Without that, the figure of 600,000 may become only the first page of a major social problem.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026