Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

FIFA Not Considering Russia’s Return to Football Competitions — What It Means for Ukraine

After a series of communications between the UAF (Ukrainian Association of Football) and FIFA leadership, the organization's council currently does not plan to reinstate Russian teams. We explain why this decision matters not only for sport but also for international solidarity with Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 9, 2026 · 2 min read

FIFA Not Considering Russia’s Return to Football Competitions — What It Means for Ukraine

Brief

The FIFA Council is not considering the return of Russian teams to competitions under the organization’s aegis. This was said by the president of the Ukrainian Association of Football, Andriy Shevchenko, after a series of communications with FIFA representatives at various levels.

UAF’s position

At the moment the FIFA Council is not considering the return of the Russians. We clearly stated our position: as long as the war continues, we are categorically against the return of Russian teams to football. Colleagues from various associations support us.

— Andriy Shevchenko, president of the Ukrainian Association of Football (UAF)

What lies behind the decision

This is not only a sporting issue. For Ukraine it concerns the moral and political stance of the international community. After an interview with FIFA president Gianni Infantino, in which the possibility of lifting the ban was raised, the UAF initiated direct contacts — and received confirmation that such consideration is not taking place at present.

Voice of the international community

European media spread information about FIFA’s position; a number of national associations supported the Ukrainian statement. The European Commission also condemned the call to reinstate Russian athletes in international football — this adds political-diplomatic pressure against any attempts at a rapid normalization.

Infantino’s words

We must. Certainly. Because this ban achieved nothing, it only created more frustration and hatred. It would help if girls and boys from Russia had the opportunity to play football in other parts of Europe.

— Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA

Implications for Ukraine

For us FIFA’s decision means the matter is being approached cautiously and with regard to the political context. Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha reminded of almost 700 Ukrainian children who will no longer be able to play football because of the war — this makes the question of the Russians’ return sensitive not only in sporting terms but also humanitarianly.

What’s next

Shevchenko plans a meeting with Gianni Infantino to once again present detailed information about the war in Ukraine and the UAF’s position. The key task is to turn verbal assurances into durable procedures that will prevent a quick “normalization” of Russia’s participation without a political decision.

Conclusion

The FIFA Council’s decision currently halts the rapid reintegration of Russian football. But the risks of pressure on sporting institutions remain. Whether international solidarity will be enough to preserve this depends on the next steps of FIFA, national associations, and partner diplomacy.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026