Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Game about the storming of Hostomel on Steam: why it's more than an "illusion of war" and how to get it removed

A Russian project has appeared on Steam that presents the battles for Hostomel through a propaganda lens. Setting emotions aside — we examine why this is a threat to public memory and how to act systematically to hold the platform accountable.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Game about the storming of Hostomel on Steam: why it's more than an "illusion of war" and how to get it removed

What happened

A page for the game Ukrainian Warfare: Gostomel Heroes (the Russian version of the title — «Гостомельські богатирі») from the studio Cats Who Play has been published on the digital store Steam. According to the description, the player takes the side of Russian forces during the battles for Hostomel in the first days of the full-scale invasion by the Russian Federation. This was reported by Ukrainian News.

Why it matters — not just for gamers

This is not merely entertainment content. Games shape narratives: they influence how history is perceived, normalize certain roles, and can serve as a tool of information aggression. According to the game's own description:

"This is not a documentary, but it recreates the events of the first days of the war with full seriousness — from the moment of the brilliant Russian landing on the outskirts of Kyiv to the time when the war seemed like it could end with the signing of a draft peace agreement in Istanbul in March 2022."

— description of the game on Steam

Such a portrayal reproduces Russian narratives and effectively justifies or romanticizes the invasion. For Ukraine, this is a matter of historical memory, information security, and a moral response to attempts to rehabilitate the aggressor.

Reasoned action: how to file a complaint and why it works

The Ukrainian gaming community is calling for mass use of the complaint mechanism on Steam — this is a direct way to draw the platform moderators' attention. Platform algorithms and policies respond to coordinated user reports and public resonance.

Steps suggested by activists:

  • Go to the game's page on Steam.
  • Click the button with the flag icon ("Report").
  • In the form, choose a reason (for example, "Slander" or "Violation of law") and indicate that the game contains: discrimination against Ukrainians, propaganda of Russian fascism, justification of war, and manipulations of historical facts.

What’s next and what to expect

Platforms make decisions based on policies and internal investigations: mass complaints accelerate review, but the final decision depends on Valve’s internal criteria. At the same time, it is worth collecting materials for media and human rights organizations — this increases public and legal pressure.

This situation is an example of a broader problem: information aggression seeks legitimization not only through propaganda media but also through cultural products. Therefore the response must be systemic: technical complaints, public analysis, and coordination with partners who work with digital platforms.

Conclusion

It is important to act quickly but rationally: complaints on Steam are an effective tool of civic oversight, but only one element. The issue of content moderation on large platforms is a matter of security and memory. Whether users can compel the platform to act responsibly depends on the scale and coordination of actions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026