Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Ukraine's GUR and Ministry of Sports publish list of Russian athletes for the 2026 Olympics

The Main Intelligence Directorate and the Ministry of Youth and Sports released information on more than 20 Russian athletes linked to CSKA and the Russian National Guard who visited occupied territories, support the war, and are seeking to participate in the 2026 Olympics.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 11, 2025 · 2 min read

Ukraine's GUR and Ministry of Sports publish list of Russian athletes for the 2026 Olympics

The Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense, together with the Ministry of Youth and Sports, published a list of Russian athletes who support the war and are seeking to participate in the 2026 Olympic Games.

The information was compiled in materials dedicated to athletes involved in propaganda and support of armed structures.

Who is on the list

According to the agencies, the list includes more than twenty athletes who represent the Central Sports Club of the Russian Army (CSKA) and the Russian National Guard (Rosgvardiya) and who have visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine.

  • Prokhorova Varvara Oleksandrivna — an active participant in international competitions, a member of the Russian national roller-ski team and the CSKA ski mountaineering team; holds the military rank of warrant officer in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation;
  • Kotmakov Petro Petrovych — a short-track speed skater, a private in the CSKA sports company; in October 2025 the International Skating Union allowed him to take part in the selection for the 2026 Olympics;
  • members of Russia’s bobsleigh and skeleton teams — servicemen of sports companies, representatives of CSKA and the Russian National Guard who visited occupied Crimea and are seeking to participate in international competitions.

CSKA's role in supporting the war

The GUR indicates that CSKA systematically provides assistance to soldiers and veterans of the so‑called special military operation: it purchases and delivers specialized equipment, FPV drones, generators and other gear to the front, and also conducts military-patriotic education of children and youth from temporarily occupied territories and organizes sports-patriotic events.

According to the intelligence service, the club's activities contribute to the spread of Russian narratives and influence, in particular during the World Military Games project.

Thus, such athletes at international competitions effectively represent the armed forces of the aggressor state, and, in the view of the agency, they should be excluded from the international sporting community and barred from competing, even under a neutral status.

Russia uses international sport as "soft power" abroad to spread its narratives, justify the war and war crimes, and legitimize the occupation

– Main Directorate of Intelligence

The intelligence service emphasizes the threat posed by the use of sport to promote state policy and justify aggression.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026