Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Iran may not travel to the 2026 World Cup in the U.S. — escalation and visa restrictions cast doubt on the national team's participation

President of the Football Federation of Iran Mehdi Taj said the team may not play in the United States after tensions escalated and entry restrictions were imposed. We examine what this means for the tournament, fans and FIFA’s reputation.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 2, 2026 · 2 min read

Iran may not travel to the 2026 World Cup in the U.S. — escalation and visa restrictions cast doubt on the national team's participation

Briefly

According to AP and UNN, the president of the Football Federation of Iran Mehdi Taj said he is not sure the national team will be able to participate in the World Cup in the USA after the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the escalation measures that followed. It is also noted that fans from Iran face restrictions on entry to the U.S., referencing earlier versions of visa policy.

What was said

"Undoubtedly, after this attack we cannot expect to look to the World Cup with hope"

— Mehdi Taj, president of the Football Federation of Iran

AP and UNN note: the official’s position is linked not only to an emotional reaction to the events but also to practical obstacles — risks to players’ safety, logistical problems, and visa restrictions for supporters.

Visa restrictions and geopolitics: why it matters

The question of the team's participation is not just a sporting dilemma. A refusal or inability to attend would affect the schedule of Group G (Iran — New Zealand, Belgium, Egypt), broadcast rights, and the perception of the tournament as a safe venue for international sport. For organizers, it is a test of their ability to separate sporting competitions from diplomatic conflicts.

What authorities and organizers say

Mexico’s president Claudia Sheinbaum has already stated there are no risks for fans in the Mexican part of the tournament, and FIFA has confirmed the plan to hold the tournament across three countries. However, guarantees of safety and access for specific teams and their fans depend on further diplomatic steps and practical decisions.

Possible scenarios

Analysts and the football community point to three realistic options: diplomatic resolution and special entry exemptions, relocating matches or holding them without the presence of Iranian supporters, or the team’s complete withdrawal from the tournament. Each option carries political and financial consequences for organizers and participants.

What’s next

Now the ball is in FIFA’s, governments’ and football institutions’ courts: can they separate the field from politics and ensure athletes’ right to compete? This is a question of security, privileges and international reputation — and the answer will affect not only one team but the perception of the tournament as a whole.

Sources: AP, UNN, official statements from FIFA and government representatives.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026