Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Tortured and killed a woman in Kyiv region: commander of Russia’s 37th Motor Rifle Brigade suspected

The Kyiv Regional Prosecutor's Office has notified a Russian serviceman of suspicion of torturing and deliberately killing a civilian on March 7, 2022 — another documented incident important for future trials and the aggressor's international accountability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Tortured and killed a woman in Kyiv region: commander of Russia’s 37th Motor Rifle Brigade suspected

Prosecutor's position

The Kyiv Regional Prosecutor's Office has notified a serviceman of the Russian Armed Forces of suspicion for violations of the laws and customs of war, combined with the intentional killing of a civilian (part 2 of Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).

"A serviceman of the Russian Armed Forces has been notified of suspicion for violations of the laws and customs of war, combined with the intentional killing of a civilian."

— Kyiv Regional Prosecutor's Office

What happened

According to the investigation, on 7 March 2022 the commander of a motorized rifle platoon of the 37th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces, together with other servicemen, arrived at one of the cottage settlements in temporarily occupied Makariv in the Kyiv region. Threatening an automatic weapon, he forced a civilian woman to enter one of the houses.

Inside the premises the occupier brutally beat the 39-year-old victim and inflicted numerous injuries on her with blunt and sharp objects. The woman died at the scene from the sustained injuries.

Why this matters

This suspicion is not only about an isolated crime, but about the systematic recording of violations of international humanitarian law in liberated territories. Documenting such episodes is necessary to bring perpetrators and potentially their commanders to account, as well as for international legal proceedings and political-legal measures against the aggressor. Human rights defenders and analysts note that the more solid the evidentiary base, the higher the likelihood of a just verdict.

What happens next

The investigation continues: investigators are collecting testimony, ordering expert examinations, and building the evidentiary base. If the charge is proven in court, this may lead to criminal liability in Ukraine and strengthen material for international tribunals. For society and the families of the victims, it is a signal: mechanisms for holding perpetrators accountable are working, but resources and international support are needed to bring cases to a conclusive end.

The remaining question: will there be enough political will and international coordination to ensure such cases do not remain only on paper, but become a basis for real justice?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026