Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Klitschko: Attacks on infrastructure have brought Kyiv to the brink of catastrophe — what it means for this winter

Putting emotions aside: Kyiv's mayor warns of systematic strikes on CHP (combined heat-and-power) plants during the harshest winter since 2022 — we explain why millions of Kyiv residents will feel it and what the consequences for the state will be.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Klitschko: Attacks on infrastructure have brought Kyiv to the brink of catastrophe — what it means for this winter

Putting emotions aside — the essence of the statement

Mayor of Kyiv Vitaliy Klychko said that continuous Russian air strikes on critical infrastructure over the past two months have brought the city to the brink of catastrophe, UNN reports citing Financial Times and RFI. At stake is the livability of the capital this winter for more than 3.5 million residents.

"At the moment the question of our country's future — whether we will survive as an independent state or not — remains open"

— Vitaliy Klychko, mayor of Kyiv (interview Financial Times)

Why it matters

Attacking infrastructure during the cold period is not an accident. FT journalists and commentators point to the systematic nature of such strikes: the destruction of CHP plants and power lines reduces the city's ability to provide heat and water, and increases risks to health and economic activity. For Kyiv residents this means concrete consequences — from heating outages to disruptions in medical and transport services.

City response and behind-the-scenes work

The city authorities reported restoring heating in 1,100 apartment buildings in a single day — an example of rapid logistics and repair crews that keep the city's basic life support running. This is a telling case: while media attention often focuses on the shelling, it is these systemic repairs that determine how people will get through the winter.

"If you want to kill someone, you shoot them in the heart. (...) Vladimir Putin's main goal is not Donetsk, not Luhansk, not Crimea. His main goal is Kyiv and all of Ukraine. He wants to destroy our independence"

— Vitaliy Klychko, mayor of Kyiv (interview Financial Times)

What’s next and what decisions to expect

The short-term risk is new outages and delays in restoring heating; the long-term challenge is the need to strengthen energy infrastructure and build up winter supplies. Experts stress that international aid and rapid repairs ease the crisis but do not replace systemic measures to protect critical infrastructure.

This is not only a humanitarian problem — it is a test of the state's ability to respond to systemic attacks. Whether there will be enough resources, logistics, and international support to get through this winter without large-scale humanitarian losses is the key question for Kyiv residents and Ukraine's partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026