Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Kyiv region steps up demining of forests in Ivankiv and Makariv communities — over 82,000 hectares suspected

KODA establishes a working group to prioritize the clearance of areas near settlements and recreational zones — this is a matter of community safety and the restoration of everyday life.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv region steps up demining of forests in Ivankiv and Makariv communities — over 82,000 hectares suspected

In brief

The Kyiv Regional State Administration (KODA) has announced an intensification of demining work in the forests of the Ivankiv and Makariv communities. According to the administration's estimates, more than 82,000 hectares of forested land may remain contaminated with explosive ordnance following combat operations in 2022. Priority will be given to areas near populated settlements and recreational zones — those places where people’s safety and the restoration of everyday life are of highest importance.

Organization of work: who is responsible for what

A special working group is being established at KODA to coordinate demining, with participation from the State Emergency Service (DSNS), foresters, the military, and representatives of local communities. This interagency format allows technical resources, local knowledge, and logistics to be combined — essential components for conducting operations safely and quickly.

"Our priority is people's safety. Work will be concentrated near populated areas and recreational zones where risks are highest."

— Kyiv Regional State Administration (KODA)

Where work is already underway and who is funding it

An example of effective cooperation is the Irpin community, where humanitarian demining continues under the "Step by Step" initiative launched last year. Thanks to contributions from the partner Help Ukraine Now and donors on the platform, funding was secured for clearance: work currently covers about 33 hectares of the Irpin forestry.

Why this matters for residents and the state

Demining is not only about equipment and hours of work; it is about the ability to safely return to normal life, restore local access to forests, revive recreation, and partially recover economic activity. Systematic coordination and funding make it possible to turn declarations into concrete hectares cleared of danger.

What to pay attention to next

The work will be phased and resource-intensive: challenges remain in personnel and financial capacity, as well as in ensuring safe logistics for operations in an area that experienced combat. The answer to the key question — whether there will be enough effort and money to systematically clear the suspected 82,000+ hectares — depends on coordination among authorities, security forces, and donor support.

Conclusion

KODA’s decision to launch a working group is a step toward organizing demining work and protecting communities. It is an example of how combining local knowledge, state resources, and donor support produces tangible results: hectares free of explosive ordnance and safer communities. Now it is important that these plans receive stable funding and clear local implementation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026