Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Massive attack on Kyiv: 22 injured, including children — damage to city infrastructure

According to Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko, 22 people were injured in eight districts of the city during heavy shelling. We examine where the most destruction occurred, which services are working on site, and why this is affecting energy supplies and residents’ safety.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 27, 2025 · 2 min read

Massive attack on Kyiv: 22 injured, including children — damage to city infrastructure

Brief — what happened

As a result of a prolonged shelling of the capital, numerous strikes and falling debris were recorded in eight districts of the city. According to Mayor Vitali Klitschko, the number of people wounded has risen to 22 people, including children. The information was released by the UNN news agency and official city services.

"The number of people wounded has risen to 22"

— Vitali Klitschko, Mayor of Kyiv

Where damage was recorded

Darnytskyi District: a strike on a 24‑storey building — upper floors damaged; another high‑rise damaged at the level of the 7th floor. A tram depot was damaged. Residents of a care home for the elderly were evacuated due to the risk of fire from the neighboring private‑sector area.

Dniprovskyi: three high‑rise buildings sustained damage. In an 18‑storey building, a search is ongoing for a person under rubble on the 5th floor. Apartments in the 25‑ and 19‑storey sections were on fire.

Holosiivskyi and Obolonskyi: cars near a service station (auto repair shop) and on the territory of a summer‑cottage cooperative were burning.

Shevchenkivskyi: a UAV (drone) struck the top floor of a 10‑storey building — a fire was recorded.

Desnianskyi: falling debris hit a garage cooperative and struck a nine‑storey building.

Solomianskyi: windows in a high‑rise building were damaged by the blast wave.

Response of services and state of infrastructure

Emergency services continue search-and-rescue operations at the impact sites. Energy workers and municipal services are working to restore supplies and eliminate the consequences of fires. Due to damage, emergency power outages have been partially implemented — the official operator reported that normal schedules are not in effect.

"Schedules are not in effect"

— Ukrenergo, operator of Ukraine's power system (official statement)

Why this matters

Attacks on residential areas and critical infrastructure have several consequences: an immediate risk to civilians, complication of rescue operations due to destruction, and the threat of prolonged disruptions in services — from electricity to public transport. This also increases the burden on hospitals and municipal services at a time when resources are limited.

Analysts and local services note that systematic work by rescuers and energy crews is currently critical to reducing long‑term consequences. Support from citizens, donors and international partners will determine the speed of recovery.

What to do now

Step by step: follow official city government channels, do not spread unverified information, observe safety rules during evacuation and assist rescue services within your capabilities. For those who can — support families of the victims and humanitarian initiatives.

Forecast: emergency services will continue to operate under heightened strain; the greatest risk is continued attacks on infrastructure, which may lead to new service disruptions. The pace of repairs will determine the everyday life of Kyiv residents in the coming days.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026