Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Almost a third of Kyiv left without heat after Russia's overnight attack — how the city will cope with the cold snap

On the night of December 27, a combined attack by Russia damaged infrastructure: a large portion of the left bank was left without electricity and heating. We examine who was affected, what energy crews are doing, and the possible consequences for residents.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 27, 2025 · 2 min read

Almost a third of Kyiv left without heat after Russia's overnight attack — how the city will cope with the cold snap

What happened

On the night of December 27, Kyiv suffered a combined attack by the Russian Federation, which caused fires in residential buildings and parking lots in several districts of the city. According to the mayor, due to damage to the energy infrastructure almost a third of the capital is currently without heat. Some districts on the left bank also have no electricity. There are casualties; rescuers evacuated 10 people from a nursing home.

"As a result of the enemy's attack, almost a third of the capital is currently without heat. There is no electricity in some districts on the left bank. Energy workers are working to restore power supply"

— Vitaliy Klitschko, mayor of Kyiv

Consequences for residents

The loss of heat and electricity in winter threatens more than just discomfort. It increases the risk for the elderly and people with reduced mobility, complicates the operation of medical facilities and communal services. Some housing was damaged by fires — this adds extra strain on emergency services and volunteers providing temporary shelter.

What the energy workers and authorities are doing

The city authorities and energy crews are working to restore electricity and heat supply on a priority basis — critical facilities, nursing homes and hospitals are first in line for restoration. Rescuers continue to extinguish fires and evacuate the injured. The city is also organizing warming centers and gathering information about the most affected districts.

Context: why this matters

Attacks on energy infrastructure during the cold season have an obvious tactical aim — to create social and humanitarian pressure. Analysts and energy specialists note that systemic damage to the network is harder and more expensive to repair precisely in freezing conditions, which amplifies the consequences for the civilian population. For Kyiv this is a matter of life-support security, and for the state — a test of infrastructure resilience.

What’s next

Now the priority is the rapid restoration of energy supply, effective coordination between city authorities, energy workers and rescuers, and the protection of the most vulnerable groups. The medium-term questions are how to strengthen the network's resilience to targeted strikes and how to speed up repair logistics under combat conditions. Until full restoration, it is important to follow official city announcements and adhere to rescue service recommendations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026