Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Heating in January: Kyiv did not charge for a service that wasn’t provided — what will change on utility bills

Municipal enterprise "Kyivteploenergo" did not charge for the period in January when heating was not provided due to enemy shelling. Part of January will be added to the February bills that Kyiv residents will receive in March — we explain who will be affected and how to check the bill.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Heating in January: Kyiv did not charge for a service that wasn’t provided — what will change on utility bills

Briefly

Kyivteploenergo did not charge for centralized heating in January bills for periods when the service was effectively not provided due to infrastructure damage from enemy shelling. The portion of January when heating was uninterrupted will be added to the February bills, which will arrive in March.

What the company said

"Kyivteploenergo did not charge for heating in the bills that Kyiv residents received in February. Charges for part of January will be added to the February bills that will be sent in March. Charges will concern only that period of January when heating was provided uninterrupted and in full — from the beginning of the month until the first attack that disrupted the operation of the heat supply system."

— reported KP "Kyivteploenergo" (quote via UNN)

Why this happened (short and to the point)

The reason is simple: intense shelling damaged critical infrastructure, which led to a temporary suspension of heat and hot water supply in many districts. Government Resolution No. 118 of 30 January 2026 regulated the procedure for recalculating the cost of utilities for periods of non-provision or partial provision, so the supplier had a legal basis for adjustments and deferring part of the charges.

Who this concerns

- Residents of buildings connected to the Kyivteploenergo system: charges for periods without heating in January were not assessed.
- Buildings serviced under other agreements (HOAs/OSBB, private companies): some buildings may have received charges for the December remainder, but January charges for the "Population" tariff category are absent.

Overpayments and timing

"For residents who paid for heating in the January bill (for example via an automatic payment or as payment for previous periods), the amount paid will be carried over as an overpayment."

— KP "Kyivteploenergo"

Practical consequence: if your payment went through automatically or you paid earlier — expect that these funds will be recorded as an overpayment and can be used to cover future bills. February bills were delivered with a delay due to the need for technical and regulatory adjustments — paper and electronic formats are available for payment.

What consumers should do

- Check the February bill, which should arrive in March: it will include lines with additional charges for the part of January when heating was supplied uninterrupted.
- Contact your supplier or HOA/OSBB if the bill looks unclear or the charges do not match the actual period of service interruption.
- Keep receipts and information about automatic payments — this will speed up the processing of overpayments.

Context and significance

This is an example of how technical logistics and regulatory adjustments work during wartime: the state sets the rules (Resolution No. 118), utility services apply them, and consumers receive adjusted documents. For household budgets this matters — in the short term some charges are postponed, not immediately creating an additional financial burden.

Conclusion

Kyivteploenergo’s decision is an expected and legally grounded response to network damage in January. The main thing now is to carefully check bills, keep documents, and request explanations if an amount does not correspond to the actual periods of service interruption. This will allow timely use of overpayments or to challenge incorrect charges.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026