Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Third "Oreshnik" — at Bila Tserkva garages: what is known about the strike and accuracy questions

On the night of May 24, Russia struck Bila Tserkva — 80 kilometers from Kyiv — with a ballistic missile "Oreshnik," while destroying several districts of the capital with other weapons. This marks the third combat use of the weapon that the Kremlin claims is invulnerable.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Third "Oreshnik" — at Bila Tserkva garages: what is known about the strike and accuracy questions

On the night of May 24, the Air Force confirmed: Russia launched a medium-range ballistic missile RS-26 "Rubezh" (in propaganda — "Oreshnik") from the Kapustin Yar test site in Astrakhan Oblast. The target was the Bila Tserkva area in Kyiv region. This is the third combat use of the missile during the full-scale invasion: the first strike hit Dnipro in November 2024, the second targeted an object in Lviv region in January 2025.

What is known about the consequences

According to the State Emergency Service of Kyiv region, after the impact, three garages in a garage cooperative caught fire and burned down. Across Kyiv region, 110 objects were damaged, two people were killed, and 11 were injured. The main strike of the night fell on Kyiv: damage was recorded in every district of the capital, among those affected was an infant.

"Putin launched his 'Oreshnik' at Bila Tserkva. They are truly insane. It is important that this does not go unpunished for Russia."

President Zelenskyy, Telegram, May 24

The Russian Ministry of Defense claimed a "retaliatory strike" on "military command facilities." The fact of hitting garages was even mocked by pro-Russian Z-bloggers, dissatisfied with the absence of a nuclear warhead.

Accuracy questions: miss or intentional target?

Defense Express analysts raised a specific question: did the "Oreshnik" miss Kyiv by 80 kilometers? According to their assessments, the two previous attacks — on Dnipro and Lviv region — may also indicate limited accuracy of the missile: it carries several separate warheads and is not capable of providing Iskander-class accuracy (5–10 m CEP). An alternative version is a deliberate strike on the Bila Tserkva airfield, where sensitive Western weapons could have been stored. The OSINT channel CyberBoroshno recorded hits directly in the garage cooperative.

  • The missile's speed, according to intelligence and Western experts' assessments, exceeds 12,000 km/h
  • The carrier can carry both conventional and nuclear warheads
  • The Pentagon identifies "Oreshnik" as a modification of the RS-26 "Rubezh"
  • None of the three strikes were accompanied by official objective control data from Moscow

The total massive strike of the night included 690 weapons — 90 missiles and over 600 drones, with hits recorded in 54 locations across the country, and fragments from destroyed targets falling in 23 more locations. Next week, EU foreign ministers plan to discuss strengthening international pressure on Russia in response to the strike.

If subsequent "Oreshnik" strikes again show deviations from stated targets — the question about the real combat value of the missile for Moscow will become a subject not only of blogger ridicule, but also of strategic reconsideration of its role as a tool of pressure on the West.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026