Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Identities of those killed in Russia's night attack on Kyiv established — among them a medic

The Kyiv Prosecutor’s Office has identified four dead after an overnight Russian attack; 26 were wounded, including rescuers and medics — what this means for the city’s security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Identities of those killed in Russia's night attack on Kyiv established — among them a medic

What happened

The Kyiv Prosecutor's Office reported that the identities of all those killed in Russia's night attack on Kyiv on January 9 have been established. They are a 49‑year‑old woman, two men — 41 and 54 years old, and a 56‑year‑old medic who had come to help the affected residents of the apartment building.

In the Dnipro district a 49‑year‑old woman and two men — 41 and 54 years old — were killed. In the Darnytsia district the Russian attack took the life of a 56‑year‑old medic who had come to help the affected residents of the apartment building

— Kyiv Prosecutor's Office

Who was affected

In addition to the dead, the prosecutor's office reports 26 wounded. Among them are 5 State Emergency Service rescuers, 4 medical workers and 1 police officer. These figures underscore that strikes on residential areas and communal infrastructure automatically increase the risks for those who respond to rescue people.

Consequences and context

According to the Center for Countering Disinformation (CPD), Russia deliberately struck infrastructure with the aim of "freezing" people; as a result of the shelling more than 500,000 consumers were left without electricity, boiler houses were damaged, and the attack lasted nearly five hours (source: statement by the Prime Minister). This is not an accidental act, but part of systematic strikes on civilian life that create a double burden — on residents and on response services.

Why this matters: strikes on critical infrastructure change priorities — not only is rapid restoration of services needed, but also preventive protection of facilities, backup power sources and personal protective equipment for rescuers and medics. Experts and local authorities emphasize the need to combine rapid reconstruction with preventive protection measures.

Sources: Kyiv Prosecutor's Office, UNN, Center for Countering Disinformation, statement by the Prime Minister.

Question for city authorities and partners: how quickly will protection of critical infrastructure be strengthened and additional resources provided to those who are rescuing people from the consequences of such attacks?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026