Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

War

Zelensky announced sporting sanctions against Russian figures after the disqualification of a Ukrainian skeleton racer

Kyiv is preparing personal sanctions against those who "put sport at the service of war." The decision is linked to the disqualification of a Ukrainian skeleton racer over a commemorative helmet — it is a signal not only to Russia but also to international institutions.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky announced sporting sanctions against Russian figures after the disqualification of a Ukrainian skeleton racer

What happened

President Volodymyr Zelensky announced the preparation of a new package of sports sanctions against Russian individuals who, according to the authorities, use sport for military purposes. According to UNN, the relevant documents have already been prepared, and a presidential decree is expected soon.

“We are preparing a new sanctions package against Russian individuals who work for the war and put sport at the service of war. The documents have already been prepared.”

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Context: the disqualification of Heraskevych

The reason for the statement is the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) decision to disqualify Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych. According to reports, the athlete intended to use a helmet bearing images of fallen Ukrainian athletes — a sign of remembrance that the IOC classified as a political gesture in the context of the 2026 Olympics.

Why this matters

Kiev’s decision can be read as attempting several things at once: to protect the symbolic memory of the dead, to demonstrate the unacceptability of using sport to legitimize aggression, and to push international organizations toward a more consistent position regarding Russia. This is not only an emotional gesture — there is a rational logic at work: if sporting arenas become instruments of influence, the country enduring aggression must have tools of response.

Mechanics and possible consequences

The officially announced package is aimed at individuals who “put sport at the service of war.” Analysts expect this will involve personal restrictions — entry bans, asset freezes and targeted reputational restrictions within the sporting sphere. Such steps have a dual effect: they increase pressure on specific actors and create a precedent for Ukraine’s partners in the world of sport and politics.

“Remembrance is not a violation.”

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

What’s next

A presidential decree and details of the sanctions package are expected in the coming days. Next are questions for international institutions: will they revise their approaches to political expressions during competitions, and are partner states ready to respond? The effectiveness of Ukraine’s steps will depend not only on the measures themselves, but also on the ability to turn political signals into concrete international coalitions and practices.

Summary: this is a signal addressed to several audiences at once — Russian actors, the international sporting community and Ukraine’s partners. Whether it can change the rules of the game in sport during wartime depends on the next moves by both Kiev and global institutions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026