Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

LNG Tanker from Sanctioned Plant Arrived in China for Second Time: Why Beijing No Longer Hides It

Gazprom has delivered a second shipment of LNG from Portuarny to the Beihai terminal on a vessel under US sanctions. China is now being recorded in public vessel tracking data and no longer masks the route.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 15, 2026 · 2 min read

LNG Tanker from Sanctioned Plant Arrived in China for Second Time: Why Beijing No Longer Hides It
Фото: EPA

In April 2025, the gas carrier Valera — formerly "Veliky Novgorod," renamed after being added to US sanctions lists — unloaded at the Beihai terminal in southern China. The cargo: liquefied natural gas from the Baltic plant "Portovaya," loaded on January 25. Both — the plant and the vessel — have been under American sanctions since January 2025.

This is already the second confirmed delivery after the restrictions were introduced. The first was in December 2024. According to LSEG and Kpler data, the routes were tracked in open databases in real-time. Nobody hid anything.

How it works without concealment

Before the sanctions, "Portovaya" sent an average of two shipments per month in winter. After the restrictions were introduced — a pause, and from August 2025 — the resumption of deliveries to China. In parallel, as Marine Link reports citing LSEG, the plant sends one shipment per month to Kaliningrad.

Beihai is the same terminal where LNG from another Russian sanctioned project, Arctic LNG-2, arrives. According to OilPrice analysts' estimates, China has already received over a dozen shipments from there.

"They no longer hide"

— France 24, December 2025, citing industry analysts

Why China changed its approach

Until August 2025, Beijing bought only non-sanctioned Russian LNG shipments — at least formally. The change in behavior coincided with two factors: Washington's pressure on Beijing in trade negotiations and simultaneous increases in discounts on Russian gas. The Chinese side receives cheaper gas, Russia — currency to finance the war. There is no enforcement mechanism for Beijing in American sanctions against "Portovaya."

  • "Portovaya" — Gazprom's only LNG plant for export, capacity 1.5 million tons per year
  • Valera — the only vessel serving this route
  • Both were added to OFAC's SDN list in January 2025 in the final days of the Biden administration
  • US sanctions prohibit American companies and individuals from conducting transactions with these entities, but do not automatically apply to Chinese buyers

Effectiveness without secondary sanctions

Sanctions against "Portovaya" were introduced as a tool for "degrading the Russian energy sector" — this is how the US Department of the Treasury formulated the objective. However, without secondary sanctions against Chinese buyers and terminal operators, the ban effectively applies only to American counterparties, of which there are none in this chain.

If the Trump administration does not impose secondary sanctions against the Beihai terminal or Chinese importers, "Portovaya" will resume pre-war shipping rates — and do so publicly, in open vessel tracking data.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026