Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Slovakia Holds EU's 20th Sanctions Package Hostage Over Pipeline That Kyiv and Moscow Describe Differently

Blanar Set a Condition: Sanctions Only After Restoring "Druzhba". But the actual reason for the pipeline shutdown remains a point of contention between Bratislava and Kyiv.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 16, 2026 · 2 min read

Slovakia Holds EU's 20th Sanctions Package Hostage Over Pipeline That Kyiv and Moscow Describe Differently
Фото: EPA / MARCIN OBARA

Slovakia's Foreign Minister Juraj Blanár announced in parliament that the country will block the adoption of the EU's 20th sanctions package against Russia until supplies of Russian oil through the Druzhba pipeline are restored. At the same time, according to Blanár, Bratislava does not object to allocating a 90 billion euro EU credit to Kyiv — meaning the sanctions lever is being applied selectively rather than as a general protest against Ukraine support.

What stopped Druzhba

The pipeline has not been operational since the end of January 2026. Kyiv claims that pumping stations in Ukraine were damaged as a result of Russian drone strikes. The Slovak and Hungarian sides dispute this version: Prime Minister Robert Fico directly accused Zelenskyy of intentionally blocking transit for political reasons.

"We do not understand the position of the Ukrainian side, which does not communicate with us and does not provide relevant information about the damage"

Juraj Blanár, Slovakia's Foreign Minister

Slovakia has appealed to the European Commission to investigate the circumstances of the damage. Zelenskyy, for his part, stated in spring that the pipeline would be repaired, but noted: "They are forcing me to restart Druzhba — how is this different from lifting sanctions on the Russians?"

The cost of alternatives

Hungary and Slovakia have switched to the Croatian Adria pipeline — but this decision created a new problem. Both countries filed complaints with the European Commission, claiming that Croatia has set tariffs three times higher than the Central European average, abusing its monopoly position. Transit through Druzhba, meanwhile, had fallen to a 10-year minimum even before the shutdown — 9.7 million tons in 2025.

Sanctions geometry

Slovakia is acting differently than Hungary in this situation. Budapest blocked both the sanctions package and the credit to Ukraine — that is, applied maximum pressure. Bratislava separated these issues: it supports the credit, but not the sanctions. This is either a more flexible negotiating tactic, or a signal that Slovakia is seeking a specific result rather than a demonstrative position.

  • Slovakia supports the EU credit to Ukraine of 90 billion euros
  • Slovakia blocks the 20th sanctions package — until oil transit is restored
  • Blanár's demand: "a clear, transparent and verified declaration" about Druzhba's resumption
  • The European Commission received a request to conduct its own investigation into the damage

The key question is not whether Druzhba will be restored technically — but who will confirm the reason for the stoppage. If the European Commission concludes that the damage is indeed technical and not dependent on Kyiv, will Bratislava lift the package blockade without any additional conditions — or will new ones appear?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026