Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Amazon Surpasses Walmart in Revenue: AWS's Role and Implications for Ukraine

Amazon has become the company with the largest annual revenue, driven by its cloud business. This is more than just numbers — it’s a sign of how technological infrastructure shapes economic and security advantage. We examine what that means for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Amazon Surpasses Walmart in Revenue: AWS's Role and Implications for Ukraine
Фото: EPA / ERIK S. LESSER

What happened

According to Bloomberg, Amazon has overtaken Walmart in annual revenue: Amazon reported $717 billion for the year ended in December, while Walmart reported $713.2 billion for the 12 months ended January 31. Both companies generate the majority of their revenues in the U.S.

Walmart is the largest physical retailer with more than 10,000 stores; Amazon is the leader in online commerce. But the key to Amazon’s advantage is its cloud unit AWS. Without AWS, Amazon’s 2025 annual revenue would be about $588 billion, meaning the company effectively embodies a “retail + platform” model.

What experts say

"This is more of a symbolic victory. Amazon did not beat Walmart in retail. It simply surpassed it in revenue by running a business Walmart does not operate in."

— Kirti Kalyanam, Executive Director of the Retail Management Institute at Santa Clara University

Why it matters

The numbers are not just about money. They show how control over digital infrastructure is turning into economic and geopolitical advantage. AWS is not just incremental profit: it’s a platform that powers services, data and solutions for businesses and government entities.

For Ukraine this has practical significance: cloud services affect the speed of digital transformation, the resilience of critical infrastructure, and opportunities for cooperation in the defense sector. The advantage of large technology ecosystems also raises issues of regulation, taxation and competition in the global market.

Market context

The most valuable company by market capitalization right now is Nvidia — about $4.5 trillion, roughly twice Amazon’s market cap and three times Walmart’s. This is a reminder that the center of economic power is increasingly shifting toward technology, not just sales volume.

Conclusion

Amazon moving ahead of Walmart in revenue is a signal: future influence of companies will be measured not only by store networks or trade volume, but by control over platforms and data. For Ukraine this is both a challenge and an opportunity: how to integrate into new value chains, take advantage of cloud services, and reduce dependencies where they are risky?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026