Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Anthropic Deliberately Keeps Its Most Powerful AI Out of Public Access — and That's What Concerns Investors

# Claude Mythos independently discovered thousands of critical vulnerabilities in every major operating system and browser. Anthropic acknowledges this, but claims the model is being withheld for protection — not attack.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Anthropic Deliberately Keeps Its Most Powerful AI Out of Public Access — and That's What Concerns Investors
Міністр фінансів США Скотт Бессент (Фото: EPA / Allison Robbert)

On April 7th, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell convened an urgent meeting with the leaders of Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs. The reason was not a data breach or leak — but a public announcement about a new artificial intelligence model.

What is Mythos and why you don't have it yet

Anthropic announced the Project Glasswing initiative based on Claude Mythos Preview — a model capable of autonomously identifying software vulnerabilities at scale. Access was granted only to select entities: Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Linux Foundation, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Palo Alto Networks. The general public is not among them.

Claude Mythos2 Preview is a general-purpose model that has not yet been released, but demonstrates an uncomfortable fact: AI has reached a level where it surpasses everyone except the most highly skilled people in finding and exploiting vulnerabilities.

"We did not intentionally teach Mythos Preview these capabilities. They emerged as a side effect of general improvements in code, reasoning, and autonomy"

— Anthropic, Project Glasswing technical report

In other words: the model learned to break systems while being trained to write better code.

What exactly has it already done

Within weeks, Mythos Preview identified thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities — previously unknown to developers — in every major operating system and every major browser, as well as in a range of other critical software.

Each documented exploit was written entirely autonomously, without any human intervention after the initial request. Mythos received a list of 100 CVEs and known Linux kernel vulnerabilities and independently selected 40 that were potentially exploitable.

Over 99% of discovered vulnerabilities remain unfixed, which is why Anthropic considers their public disclosure irresponsible. The model that knows where the "holes" are is not being released to the network — but details about it have already leaked previously due to human error in storing data in a publicly accessible cache.

Anthropic's logic: attack first to defend

Project Glasswing is an "urgent attempt" to use frontier model capabilities to defend before similar capabilities fall into the hands of hostile actors. Anthropic is allocating up to $100 million in model usage credits and $4 million in direct donations to open-source security organizations.

There is also a purely pragmatic argument for such logic: the same capabilities that make AI models dangerous in hostile hands make them invaluable for finding and fixing vulnerabilities in critical software.

  • Defenders have gained an advantage now — but a temporary one: frontier model capabilities will likely improve significantly within the next few months.
  • The banking system is among the priority targets: this is why the Treasury Department gathered CEOs, not technical directors.
  • Open source is the weakest link: open source comprises the vast majority of code in modern systems, including those used by AI agents themselves to write new software.

The question is not whether someone will find these vulnerabilities. Anthropic has already found them. The question is whether 99% of unfixed holes can be patched before a similar model ends up in the hands of someone who won't schedule meetings with bankers, but will act immediately — and at what cost the first attack will come if this doesn't happen.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026