Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Automated release for imports: Customs speeds up import clearance for AEOs and aligns standards with the EU

For the first time in Ukraine, automated clearance has been extended to imports and temporary admission — for now to companies with the highest trust level (AEO). This speeds up supply chains and signals to partners the reliability of our customs infrastructure.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Automated release for imports: Customs speeds up import clearance for AEOs and aligns standards with the EU
Фото: Depositphotos

What happened — in brief

The State Customs Service has launched the country’s first case of a fully automated release of goods in the import and temporary importation regimes. Previously the auto-clearance technology was used only for exports; it is now extended to imports, but at this stage only for businesses with the highest level of trust, i.e., for AEOs (authorized economic operators).

"This direction of development corresponds to the practice of the European Union, where the automation of customs procedures is standard for compliant businesses. Introducing auto-release in the import regime is another step for Ukraine toward aligning customs procedures with European ones"

— State Customs Service (official statement)

Who it concerns

Primarily — companies with AEO status. This status means that a company operates according to high safety and compliance standards in international supply chains. For such companies the system provides:

simplified declaration procedures; priority handling of customs formalities; a reduced risk profile in the automated system; dedicated lanes at checkpoints. This is not only convenience for business, but a real reduction in delivery time and transit risks.

How it works — technology and limitations

Auto-release is carried out based on the results of an automated risk assessment by the customs processing system. Unlike exports, imports are subject to stricter criteria — regarding goods, operations and the importers themselves. The pilot for automated processing of export declarations started in May 2020; according to the Customs Service, in February 2026 over 6.5% of export declarations were processed completely automatically.

Why it matters for Ukraine

In short — it’s a matter of speed, transparency and trust. Automating imports for reliable businesses:

1) reduces processing time and lowers corruption risks by minimizing interactions that require manual intervention; 2) increases the predictability of logistics for companies, which is important during wartime and in economic recovery; 3) brings Ukraine’s procedures closer to EU standards, which is important for integration and the trust of international partners.

Last year’s record performance with the NCTS common transit system (2025) demonstrates that our infrastructure can scale — the task now is to refine algorithms for import and gradually expand the circle of beneficiaries.

What’s next

For now — this is a controlled step: strict criteria and testing of mechanisms. The answer to the key question — whether the system can be expanded to more companies and larger groups of goods — will depend on the results of this stage and on technical and political support. If everything goes according to plan, this will become another practical argument for investors and partners: Ukrainian customs can operate to European standards and support economic resilience in difficult times.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026