Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

British banks oppose loan to Ukraine funded by frozen Russian assets

British commercial banks oppose using about £8 billion of frozen Russian funds for a loan to Ukraine, citing potential legal consequences and the absence of government guarantees.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 11, 2025 · 2 min read

British banks oppose loan to Ukraine funded by frozen Russian assets

British banks have voiced objections to a plan to channel about £8 billion of frozen Russian assets into a loan for Ukraine. Financial institutions fear legal risks and a lack of state protection in the event of lawsuits from Russia.

Resistance from financial institutions

Bankers emphasize that the authorities have not proposed an insurance mechanism against possible retaliatory actions by Russia. Sector representatives warn of likely lengthy legal disputes if the assets are used for an interest-free loan to Ukraine.

Legal and reputational risks

Information about which banks are holding these assets has not been disclosed. Commercial institutions are demanding clarity on possible liabilities and government support should lawsuits be brought against them.

The legal risk is that if Ukraine cannot repay, disputes may arise between the state and Russia over title to the assets

– Adviser to leading British banks

The government has so far not confirmed whether it is prepared to provide assistance to banks if the assets are used specifically for a lending mechanism rather than being fully expropriated.

European coordination

The British plans do not affect around £28 billion frozen under individual sanctions on Russia-linked individuals. Discussions on a reparations loan are being held in parallel with EU initiatives, but no decision has yet been agreed.

Estimates suggest talks over agreements on the use of the assets will not be completed before Christmas, although negotiations in Europe have been constructive.

Earlier, French authorities expressed disapproval of commercial banks’ participation in such a loan: Paris supports the idea of helping Ukraine but objects to using assets held in private banks because of those institutions’ contractual obligations.

  • The European Commission proposed using up to €210 billion of frozen assets of the Russian central bank to help Ukraine, with an initial plan to allocate €90 billion over two years; the matter is to be considered at the EU summit on 18 December.
  • German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen were unable to persuade Belgium’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever to agree to a reparations loan funded by assets frozen in Belgium.
  • Resolving this issue will affect budget planning in a number of countries, including funding for 2026.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026