Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Citizens' share in the OVDP portfolio exceeds 5% — a signal of confidence and an additional source of budget financing

Household investments in government bonds climbed to UAH 111.9 billion in 2025. Why this matters for your savings and the resilience of the budget — brief and to the point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 5, 2026 · 2 min read

Citizens' share in the OVDP portfolio exceeds 5% — a signal of confidence and an additional source of budget financing

Brief and important

In 2025 household investments in domestic government bonds (OVDP) grew by 42.6% — from 78.5 billion hryvnia to 111.9 billion hryvnia. Thanks to this, the share of individuals in the total OVDP portfolio increased from 4.2% to 5.7%. These are not just numbers — they indicate how Ukrainians’ attitudes toward government securities as a tool for preserving and growing savings are changing.

"Investment by households in domestic government bonds rose by 42.6% in 2025"

— Ministry of Finance of Ukraine

What the numbers say

Alongside households, legal entities continue to play an important role: their holdings grew by 19% — to 212.3 billion hryvnia (a 10.8% share). The main holders of OVDP are commercial banks (47.7% of the portfolio, 937.1 billion hryvnia) and the National Bank (33.8%, 664.5 billion hryvnia), although the NBU’s portfolio declined by 13 billion hryvnia over the year.

In 2025 the state budget raised about 570 billion hryvnia through OVDP auctions, making domestic borrowings the second-largest source of financing after external sources. The weighted-average yields for the year were 16.24% in hryvnia, 3.22% in euro and 4.17% in dollars.

Why this matters to you

First, high real and nominal rates make OVDP attractive for those seeking relatively safe options for savings during war and inflation. Second, growing retail interest reduces the state's reliance on immediate external borrowings and increases financial resilience in case access to external markets is limited.

Risks and limitations

OVDP are a form of public debt, so their yields and liquidity depend on fiscal policy and the macroeconomic situation. In addition, a significant share of the papers is concentrated in banks and the NBU: this creates a risk structure that should be taken into account when assessing the stability of the financial system.

What’s next

The Ministry of Finance plans to raise up to 420 billion hryvnia through OVDP in 2026. Reprofiling of inflation-linked bonds totaling about 145.2 billion hryvnia is also being considered — a step that could change the structure of liabilities and affect yields.

Analysts agree: the rise in household participation is a positive signal of confidence in public finances, but sustainable results require transparent budget decisions and appropriate macroeconomic policy. Will the domestic market be sufficient to temporarily reduce the need for external borrowing? The answer to that question will determine financial stability in the years ahead.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026