Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Dragon Capital updates forecasts: base-case scenario — prolonged war and pressure on the energy sector

The company offers two paths: continued hostilities that would devastate energy systems, or a truce accompanied by a severe labor shortage. We explain why this matters for the economy and your wallet right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 27, 2026 · 2 min read

Dragon Capital updates forecasts: base-case scenario — prolonged war and pressure on the energy sector
Фото: EPA / Сергій Долженко

Briefly

Investment company Dragon Capital has updated its macroeconomic forecast for 2026–2027 and laid out two scenarios: the baseline — continuation of active hostilities, and an alternative — establishment of a stable ceasefire in mid-2026. This assessment is important not only for markets: it shapes the expectations of donors, investors and the state budget.

What the forecast says

“Dragon Capital's baseline scenario is based on the assumption that active hostilities will continue and Russia will keep destroying Ukraine's critical infrastructure.”

— Dragon Capital, macroeconomic forecast (27.03.2026)

In numbers this means: GDP growth of 1.5% in 2026 (previously forecast at 1%) and only 0.5% in 2027. If there are no new strikes on the energy sector, 2026 growth could jump to 3.5%. But more extensive infrastructure damage would mean even slower recovery.

Dragon Capital also sees pressure on the national currency: an expected devaluation of about 7% to 45.5 UAH/$ in 2026 and a further 5% to 48.0 UAH/$ in 2027. At the same time, inflation rates are expected to stabilize, while the external trade deficit will remain record-high.

Alternative scenario: ceasefire and a demographic challenge

“After the war, only 15% of refugees will return to Ukraine, or about 1 million people, of whom approximately 0.3 million will join the workforce.”

— Dragon Capital, macroeconomic forecast (27.03.2026)

This means that even in the event of peace, the main problem for the economy could become a sharp labor shortage. The labor market has already experienced several shocks — the pandemic, mass migration, war, and the rapid development of digital technologies and artificial intelligence. As LIGA.net wrote, this has caused a paradox: experienced specialists are increasingly competing with less experienced candidates or those with minimal formal experience.

Consequences for the country and citizens

For the state: the need to combine rapid repair of critical infrastructure with programs to return and employ those who come back. For business: investment planning that takes into account the risk of regular energy supply disruptions or, conversely, preparation for labor shortages and boosting productivity through automation and training.

For every Ukrainian, this is a question of income and price security: devaluation and a high import deficit affect the cost of energy, fuel and essential goods.

What to do — brief recommendations

Analysts advise focusing on three areas: protecting energy infrastructure, accelerated repair and modernization of networks, and investment in human capital — retraining, adapting educational programs to the labor market and incentives to bring specialists back.

Conclusion

Dragon Capital's forecast is not a verdict but a roadmap of risks. If partners and the private sector do not increase support for infrastructure recovery and employment programs, the baseline scenario will mean slower recovery and greater pressure on the exchange rate and prices. Now the ball is in the court of those who set budgets and make investment decisions: will declarations be transformed into concrete investments and programs?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026