Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Reconstruction Fund: Cabinet develops mechanism, there will be no tax

While the world decides how to punish the aggressor, Ukraine is preparing a separate reconstruction fund — with funding sources, but without a new tax until the end of the war. This could become a historic moment for our children and the economy.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

Reconstruction Fund: Cabinet develops mechanism, there will be no tax

The paradox of war: they try to break us, and we are already preparing to rebuild after victory. The Cabinet is working on creating a separate reconstruction fund with its own funding mechanism — and this decision concerns everyone who calls Ukraine their home.

Deputy Minister of Development of Communities and Territories Aliona Shkrum told Forbes Ukraine that the idea of a fund is being discussed, including based on models used by other countries. But there is a fundamental condition — no separate tax will be introduced until the war ends.

The reason is simple: no international bank is designed for large-scale reconstruction during active hostilities. Many institutions require long bureaucratic procedures and high state guarantees, and we need money today.

"Grants are approximately 5–10%. And that is a problem, because loans will have to be repaid by our children. That is wrong."

– Aliona Shkrum, Deputy Minister of Development of Communities and Territories

Why this matters

This is not just a technical budget conversation — it is a battle for the future of our cities, schools and hospitals. If reconstruction falls on loans, our children will pay. That is why creating a fund with transparent sources of financing is an urgent national task.

The head of the relevant committee of the Verkhovna Rada and Secretary of the Recovery Council, Danylo Hetmantsev, firmly rejects the option of new taxes after the war and names other priority sources.

"No, under no circumstances are we considering additional taxes for recovery. Sources of reconstruction should be funds from formalizing the shadow economy, resources mobilized by partners, investments and reparations from Russia."

– Danylo Hetmantsev, Member of Parliament, Secretary of the Recovery Council

Sources of funding

There are specifics — formalization of the shadow economy, external and internal investments, partner funds and reparations from Russia. Added to this is a major international step: the European Commission has proposed using up to €210 billion of blocked assets of the Russian Central Bank to assist Ukraine.

Everyone is discussing this proposal: the decision on the mechanism for reparations and reconstruction loans is scheduled to be considered at the EU summit on December 18–19. Western analysts believe that adopting such an initiative could become a turning point for quickly launching large-scale reconstruction.

What’s next

We stand at a historic moment: how quickly and clearly the financial architecture for reconstruction is built will determine whether the aggressor or our children will pay. Insiders and experts emphasize — now we must push for reparations, attract investments, and establish a transparent fund that will work to restore cities and villages.

This is not simple bureaucracy — it is a matter of justice and security. We must turn the crisis into an opportunity: ensure reconstruction at the expense of those who started the war, and build a strong, resilient state for future generations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026