Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Indonesia Rejects U.S. Demands in Trade Talks

Jakarta rejected terms that threatened the country’s economic sovereignty.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

November 28, 2025 · 1 min read

Indonesia Rejects U.S. Demands in Trade Talks

Indonesia refused to accept the so‑called "poison pill" and other US demands in a trade agreement. This calls into question America's efforts to curb China's influence in Southeast Asia.

The dispute arose during discussions of the terms of a preliminary agreement concluded in July, which included a 19 percent "reciprocal tariff" for Indonesia. Three people familiar with the negotiations confirmed that Indonesia rejected terms that the US had imposed on Malaysia and Cambodia.

The US attempted to introduce "poison pills" — "loyalty" clauses in the agreements that threaten to void them if countries make deals with competitors, jeopardizing American interests.

"We cannot agree to these clauses as they violate our economic sovereignty," said an Indonesian government representative.

The agreements with Malaysia and Cambodia require the countries to comply with US sanctions, avoid digital taxes that could hinder the operations of American companies, and to coordinate with Washington any digital trade deals with third countries.

In Indonesia there are concerns that such demands could limit the country's ability to make independent decisions, effectively subordinating it to American demands.

  • On October 27 the US concluded bilateral trade agreements with Malaysia and Cambodia, and also signed a framework agreement with Thailand, which provides for cooperation in removing trade barriers.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026