Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Cabinet extends reduced coefficients for special pensions — how it will affect the budget and pensions

Money loves silence: the government has extended a mechanism limiting payments for pensions above 10 times the subsistence minimum. We examine who will lose out on payments and why this decision is important for the country's financial stability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 31, 2025 · 2 min read

Cabinet extends reduced coefficients for special pensions — how it will affect the budget and pensions

What was adopted

The Cabinet of Ministers extended into 2026 the application of reduction coefficients for special pensions whose size exceeds 10 subsistence minimums (for persons who have lost their ability to work). This is recorded in Resolution No.1778 of 30 December.

"Resolution No.1778 of 30 December continues the application of reduction coefficients to the portion of payments that exceeds the threshold of 10 subsistence minimums"

— Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, Resolution No.1778

Who it applies to

The special payment regime applies to a number of categories: civil servants, prosecutors, members of parliament, diplomats, scientists and other recipients of special pensions. At the same time, the restrictions do not apply to participants in the anti-terrorist operation / Joint Forces Operation, persons who took part in the defense of Ukraine, or family members of fallen defenders.

How the coefficients work

For the portion of a pension that exceeds 10 subsistence minimums, reduction coefficients are applied:

  • 0.5 — for the amount between 10 and 11 minimums;
  • 0.4 — for the amount between 11 and 13 minimums;
  • 0.3 — for the amount between 13 and 17 minimums;
  • 0.2 — for the amount between 17 and 21 minimums;
  • 0.1 — for the amount above 21 minimums.

Practically this means: the first 25,950 UAH (10 minimums) are paid in full, and everything above that — partially.

Example of the impact

If a special pension amounts to 25 subsistence minimums, then in 2025 after applying the coefficients it will fall from 64,875 UAH to about 35,551 UAH — a difference of roughly 45%.

Why this was done

The decision has two logical components: first, it is a mechanism to control budget expenditures amid a prolonged war; second, an effort to preserve the financial stability of the social guarantees system for millions of pensioners with smaller payments. Experts note that without such temporary restrictions, state spending on some social payments would have grown faster than budget revenues.

What this means for citizens

The average pension as of 1 October 2025 is 6,437 UAH, and most pensioners will be practically unaffected by these changes. At the same time, for a small group of holders of large special pensions the adoption of the resolution means a noticeable reduction in payments. For the state, this is a short-term tool to reduce the burden on the budget.

Brief conclusion

This government decision is an example of a pragmatic balance between social justice and budgetary resilience in wartime. It does not resolve the issue of structural reform of the pension system, but it provides time and space for a broader discussion on how to make the system more resilient in the long term.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026