Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

"Unlicensed Casinos — Bank with No Questions: How 5 Billion Hryvnia Passed Through 'Goods Payment'"

# The BEB Case on Illegal Gambling Network — It's Not Just About Casinos. It's About How Banking Infrastructure Converted Betting into USDT as "Supplier Settlements."

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 2 min read

"Unlicensed Casinos — Bank with No Questions: How 5 Billion Hryvnia Passed Through 'Goods Payment'"
Фото: Офіс генпрокурора

The Bureau of Economic Security and the Office of Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko reported suspects in ten individuals involved in a network of illegal online casinos with an estimated turnover of 5 billion hryvnias. Among the suspects are Russian citizens. But what's most interesting about this case isn't the gambling business itself.

Scheme: From bet to "invoice"

According to the investigation, the organizers launched at least five websites — some of which previously had legal licenses that were later revoked. Instead of shutting down, the platforms simply relaunched under the same names. Players topped up their accounts with cryptocurrency — mostly USDT stablecoins.

Then comes the banking part. As the BEB established in parallel proceedings against Aibox Bank, they used the technique of "miscoding" to legalize funds: more than 20 controlled companies opened accounts at the bank, and players transferred money to them — but indicated payment for non-existent goods and services in the payment description.

"The suspects, together with the bank's shareholders, organized a money laundering scheme using miscoding."

— from the BEB report on the Aibox Bank case

Miscoding is transaction code substitution: payment for gambling services is recorded in the system as payment for goods or services. This allows bypassing automatic bank compliance filters and National Bank monitoring.

What has already happened in court

The case is not new — it has been developing since 2024. Two department directors of Aibox Bank have already been arrested. Bank co-owner Alona Shevtsova was announced as wanted — she is currently hiding abroad. In Poland, Irina Tsyganok, the director of one of the bank's departments, was detained. The BEB has already forwarded part of the materials to court.

Scale: 5 million daily

According to the investigation's calculations, the network generated approximately 5 million hryvnias in turnover daily. Per year — over one and a half billion. The 5 billion figure is likely the cumulative turnover over several years of operation, part of which has already been laundered.

  • At least 5 websites — some under old, previously licensed names
  • More than 20 shell companies with accounts at one bank
  • Cryptocurrency entry — fiat exit through "goods" payments
  • Among the suspects are RF citizens, some individuals are hiding abroad

Why this is more than criminal news

The legal gambling market in Ukraine began operating after the law was adopted in 2020 — and immediately faced competition from illegal operators who don't pay licensing fees and taxes. According to the Commission for the Regulation of Gambling and Lotteries (KRAIL), the share of illegal gambling on the Ukrainian internet remains significant: blocking websites can't keep up with their relaunches.

This case shows the logical next step: an illegal casino without a banking partner is just a website with a crypto wallet. It's precisely the connection to banking infrastructure that transforms it into a full-fledged financial crime with the ability to withdraw funds into the real economy.

If the court proves guilt under the article on money laundering — and not just on organizing gambling — this will become a precedent: bank compliance as complicity, not just a technical error.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026