Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

China curbs investments in Russia: $17.4 billion on hold — what this means for financing the aggression

Although Beijing talks about a "strategic friendship," real capital is not rushing into the Russian economy. We unpack what lies behind the figures and what the consequences are for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 6, 2026 · 1 min read

China curbs investments in Russia: $17.4 billion on hold — what this means for financing the aggression

What intelligence shows

The Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine reports: the volume of accumulated Chinese investment in Russia is effectively frozen at $17.4 billion. After a short-lived rise in 2022, the inflow of capital from China stopped, and by 2025 the total amount had not increased.

Where the money goes — and what's missing

The only notable increase was expansion in the sector of financial services (+50%). Chinese banks are increasing their presence not to finance large industrial projects, but to serve trade and payment channels. Meanwhile, the raw materials sector — traditionally attractive to Beijing — contracted from $9 billion to $8.8 billion.

"Chinese investors are acting as pragmatically as possible, entering the Russian economy only to the extent they deem safe in light of sanctions risks, or avoiding investments altogether"

— Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine

Additional risk: gold

At the same time, trade dynamics have another side: in 2025 Russia increased exports of gold to China — 25.3 tonnes were sold, nine times more than a year earlier. This allows obtaining liquidity outside banking channels and partially compensating for the lack of traditional investments.

Why this matters for Ukraine

Beijing's pragmatic stance has a twofold effect for us. On one hand, the absence of large-scale Chinese investment in industry and energy limits Russia's ability for long-term reconstruction and technological rearmament. On the other, the strengthening of precious-metals trade creates alternative sources of financing for the aggressor.

Short forecast and questions for partners

Analysts expect that China will maintain a cautious balance: preserving economic ties with Russia while avoiding open investment in sensitive sectors. This gives Ukraine room for international coordination — strengthening financial monitoring, putting pressure on precious-metals trade channels, and working with partners on restrictions that will make sanctions evasion impossible.

Whether statements and figures will be turned into effective policy is now the key question for our allies.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026