Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Compensation for farmers in frontline areas: up to UAH 4,700 per hectare and 100 modular grain elevators

The Cabinet of Ministers has updated the support mechanism for farmers in areas of potential and active hostilities — up to UAH 4,700 per hectare, with a limit of 2,000 hectares. This is a direct investment in preserving production and food security on the frontline.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 22, 2026 · 1 min read

Compensation for farmers in frontline areas: up to UAH 4,700 per hectare and 100 modular grain elevators

What the Cabinet approved

The Cabinet of Ministers announced improvements to the compensation mechanism for agricultural producers operating in areas of potential and active hostilities. The compensation amount is up to UAH 4,700 per hectare, and the maximum payout per farm is limited to 2,000 hectares. Those who suffered losses due to the war or adverse weather conditions are eligible for support.

“Farmers will be able to receive compensation of up to UAH 4,700 per hectare of damaged crops, but not for more than 2,000 hectares per farm. Targeted support will help farmers preserve production and continue operating under difficult conditions.”

— Yuliia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister

Logistics and infrastructure

Separately, the government is allocating 100 modular grain storage facilities with a capacity of up to 1,000 tonnes each. This is an operational solution for preserving the harvest where traditional infrastructure is damaged or inaccessible due to security risks.

Why this matters

This is not just a one-off payment — it is part of a strategy to preserve production in vulnerable regions. For the state and the market, it is important that farmers have an incentive to stay on the land, since crop losses on the frontline translate into risks for food security and logistics as a whole. Experts in the agricultural sector note that the effectiveness of the measure will depend on the speed of payments and the transparency of the mechanism.

What’s next

The key question is operational implementation: how quickly the state will identify those affected, provide payments and deliver the modular storage facilities. If the system operates swiftly and transparently, it will reduce the risk of harvest losses and support the stability of supplies from frontline regions.

In short: up to UAH 4,700/ha, up to 2,000 ha per farm, 100 modular grain elevators of 1,000 tonnes each — this is targeted support intended to help preserve agricultural production during the war. Now it is important that words be turned into swift and transparent action.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026