Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

"Bought a Machine – No Machine, But the Debt Remains: EBRD Tests a Mechanism Ukraine Has Never Had"

# First in EBRD Practice: Bank Partially Writes Off Credit If Asset Destroyed by War For the first time, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is partially forgiving loans when assets have been destroyed by the war. The program currently applies to clients of PrivatBank and Raiffeisen Bank, and only covers capital investments.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 3 min read

"Bought a Machine – No Machine, But the Debt Remains: EBRD Tests a Mechanism Ukraine Has Never Had"
Наслідки російського удару по будівельному гіпермаркету АРС у Тернополі, 1 травня 2026 року (Фото: ARS.ua / Facebook)

An entrepreneur bought equipment on credit, then came a strike — and the machine is gone, but the debt remains. This situation, which has become typical for thousands of Ukrainian businesses, is what a new mechanism from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is trying to solve.

What was launched and how it works

The EBRD, together with PrivatBank and Raiffeisen Bank, is launching a pilot mechanism Enterprise Security Enhancement (ESE) — the first such instrument in the bank's history. The total financing volume is 8 million euros: 6.8 million for PrivatBank and 1.2 million for Raiffeisen Bank. The funds come from the EBRD's Shareholder Special Fund.

The logic is simple: if a borrower took out a loan to purchase fixed assets — equipment, machinery, buildings — and these assets were directly damaged or destroyed as a result of military operations, the bank can partially write off the remaining debt. The EBRD and donors compensate the bank for the respective losses.

According to the EBRD, Ukrainian companies currently remain legally responsible for loans even when the financed assets have already been destroyed, and war risk insurance for businesses remains extremely limited.

Who can apply — and what not to expect

The ESE mechanism applies exclusively to loans for capital investments. Loans for working capital, that is, for current business expenses, are not covered by the program. Minimum damage thresholds and compensation limits at the level of individual projects are also provided — so that the instrument does not become a way to solve any financial problem.

Each application will go through verification: the partner bank will verify it together with the EBRD or engaged independent consultants before any compensation payment is made.

«This mechanism is very important for Ukrainian business, as it will allow continued operations and reinvestment of funds. Unfortunately, due to the full-scale war, entrepreneurs work in conditions where their property can be destroyed at any moment».

Mikael Bjornert, Chairman of PrivatBank

According to Bjornert, in 2025, 40% of loan applications at PrivatBank were for investment purposes — a signal that business continues to invest even under shelling.

The scale of the problem that 8 million euros won't solve

According to the NBU, as of early 2025, the total volume of non-performing loans of enterprises in Ukraine's banking system was 347 billion hryvnia — almost 39% of the entire corporate loan portfolio. Part of these debts is directly related to destroyed or occupied assets.

Against this backdrop, 8 million euros is essentially a pilot to test the model, not a large-scale solution to the problem. The EBRD explicitly states: after the testing phase, financing is planned to be attracted from external donors, including the European Commission within the framework of the Ukraine Investment Framework — part of the EU aid package worth 50 billion euros. Later, the mechanism is planned to be expanded to other Ukrainian partner banks of the EBRD.

What this means practically

  • Clients of PrivatBank and Raiffeisen Bank with loans for equipment or real estate damaged by the war can apply for partial debt forgiveness.
  • The specific percentage of write-off is not fixed in advance — it depends on the verified amount of losses and project limits.
  • Clients of other banks are currently outside the mechanism, but the EBRD declares expansion after the pilot.
  • Households who took mortgages on property destroyed in the combat zone also potentially fall under the mechanism.

The key question of the pilot is not the amount of money, but whether the verification model will work in active war conditions: how to confirm the fact and degree of damage, who is responsible for the assessment, and how accessible the procedure will be for small businesses, not just for large borrowers with resources for paperwork. If the pilot shows an acceptable level of abuse and operational manageability — the mechanism could become a template for a large-scale recovery program. If not, the Ukraine Investment Framework will have another unrealized line in its list of intentions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026