Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Ministry of Defense cites end of fiscal year for delay in December payments; funds en route to units

The Ministry of Defense assures that the outstanding portion of December’s monetary allowances will be paid in January. We examine why the delay occurred, what it means for service members, and the broader state and international context.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Ministry of Defense cites end of fiscal year for delay in December payments; funds en route to units

Briefly

The Ministry of Defence explained that the partial payment of salaries for December 2025 was linked to the specifics of closing the budget year. According to the press service, the decision was made to ensure stable funding and does not violate the law. All remaining amounts are promised to be paid in January 2026.

"The partial payment of monetary allowances for December, which took place at the end of December 2025, was caused by the specifics of closing the budget year. This decision was made to ensure stable funding and is not a violation of the law."

— Press Service of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine (according to the Department of Social Security)

Reason — the mechanics of the budget cycle

The ministry points to the procedures for closing the budget year. On January 6, 2026, the defence minister signed order No. 38/ud, which confirms: monetary allowances must be paid by the 20th of each month, and if funds arrive later — within three days after receipt. This means that the technical timing of funding, and not an intent to save on the military, was the main reason for the temporary non-payment.

"As of January 7, the necessary financial resources have already been directed to lower-level budget administrators (military units) to carry out the appropriate calculations"

— Press Service of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine

What this means for the military

According to official data, all remaining December amounts will be paid in January. The minimum level of monetary provision in the army is 20,000 UAH — this sum has not changed since February 2023 after the cancellation of a 30,000 UAH supplement for rear services. At the same time, political and personnel discussions are underway about a possible increase in base rates: previously the president and government leadership mentioned target benchmarks for new contracts in the range of 50–60 thousand UAH, and the defence minister spoke of priorities — new contracts alongside efforts to find options for increases.

Broader context: the budget and external support

The issue of payments is not only technical but also political and international. In July 2025 the president asked partners in the EU to help finance monetary provisions — a reminder that part of the stability of payments depends on timely international aid and contract signings. Experts note: while declarations of support are important, the key is turning promises into concrete tranches and contracts that stabilize financial flows.

Conclusion — no rhetoric, a demand for efficiency

The technical explanation from the Ministry of Defence clarifies the reasons for the delay, but it does not remove the question of systemic stability in army funding. If the state machinery and partners want to guarantee that service members receive their pay on time, declarations must turn into contracts and funds. Whether the coming weeks will be a test of that capacity is a question awaited not only by soldiers but also by society and international partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026