Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Ukraine's international reserves fell by 5%: buffer remains intact, but risks are rising

As of March 1, reserves stood at $54.75 billion — the first decline since July 2025. We explain what drove the change and why it matters for the exchange rate, the budget, and economic security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukraine's international reserves fell by 5%: buffer remains intact, but risks are rising
Фото пресслужби НБУ

Brief

According to the press service of the National Bank of Ukraine, the country's international reserves decreased by 5% in February. As of 1 March their volume stood at $54.75 billion compared with a record $57.66 billion as of 1 February — the first decline since July 2025.

What happened

Main factors explaining the decline in reserves in February:

  • The NBU sold almost $3 billion on the foreign exchange market; however, net currency sales fell by 19.8% compared with January — a sign of reduced pressure on the exchange rate.
  • $1 billion arrived on the government's foreign currency accounts, including $690.8 million through World Bank accounts under the G7 initiative (ERA) and $309.6 million from the placement of domestic government bonds (OVDP).
  • $804.1 million was paid for servicing and repaying public debt, while revaluation of financial instruments added another $152.5 million to the value of reserves.

"Despite the reduction, the volume of international reserves is sufficient to maintain the stability of the foreign exchange market. The current volume provides financing for 5.7 months of future imports," the statement says.

— Press service of the National Bank of Ukraine

Why it matters

Reserves are not a vanity balance-sheet number but a real buffer for imports, debt servicing and exchange-rate support. Coverage of 5.7 months of imports means near-term needs can be met without emergency measures, but the decline is a reminder: reserves respond to flows — both defense and debt-service expenditures and inflows from partners.

On the other hand, the reduction in the NBU's net currency sales alongside inflows from the G7 ERA and OVDP placements points to a combination of external support and market stabilization. This is an important signal for investors and creditors: support mechanisms are working, but they need to be maintained and scaled up.

Outlook and risks

The NBU has improved its forecast and expects reserves to grow to $65 billion in 2026 and to $72.9 billion in 2027. This indicates confidence from partners and the market, but it is also a projection that requires confirmation by real flows — aid, investment and sustained fiscal discipline.

Conclusion

The February decline in reserves is a worrying signal, but not a crisis: the balance shows both pressure factors (debt payments) and support factors (G7 ERA payments, OVDP). The coming months will show whether partners' promises translate into steady inflows. For every citizen this is a matter of currency security, price stability and the state's ability to fund defense and basic needs.

Economists and markets are watching two things closely: first — the pace of inflows from international partners; second — the pace of debt repayments. If these flows balance out, the NBU's forecast has a chance of becoming reality. If not — additional sources of support will need to be found.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026