Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

NABU completes investigation into former head of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Military Administration

The Anti-Corruption Bureau has completed its investigation into the former head of the Oblast Military Administration and other individuals suspected of embezzling more than UAH 392 million during road repairs.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 10, 2025 · 2 min read

NABU completes investigation into former head of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Military Administration

The National Anti‑Corruption Bureau has completed the investigation into the former head of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Military Administration and several accomplices.

They are suspected of embezzling more than UAH 392 million in the course of road repair and restoration works.

According to the investigation, the suspects falsified documents to speed up receipt of funds and avoid mandatory procedures, including the development of project documentation, its expert review, and technical supervision.

Some of the funds were transferred to related companies

– NABU

Suspicions and charges

Investigators believe that, instead of current or capital repairs, the work items were recorded as operational maintenance, which in 2022 was considered a priority. Costs were allegedly inflated to about UAH 1.5 billion, and contract sums were concluded with a company linked to the then head of the regional administration. Part of the material costs were allegedly overstated by more than UAH 392 million, and those funds were transferred to the accounts of other firms controlled by the official and his deputy.

In September 2024, five people were notified of suspicions. Their actions have been qualified under Part 5 of Article 191 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (misappropriation or embezzlement of property through abuse of official position). The former head of one of the RMA's departments was also suspected of illegal enrichment under Article 368‑5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Earlier publications and measures

Materials from the case indicate that one of the figures is the former head of the Dnipropetrovsk RMA, Valentyn Reznichenko.

  • On November 2, 2022, a journalistic investigation was published reporting that the Dnipropetrovsk region had spent about UAH 2.3 billion on road repairs, and a significant portion of those funds went to a company whose co‑owner had close ties to Reznichenko.
  • On September 12, 2024, Valentyn Reznichenko was served with a notice of suspicion for abuses during road repairs.
  • On September 16, the High Anti‑Corruption Court set his preventive measure as bail; on September 18, UAH 30 million in bail was posted.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026